Governor Sibley
Section 109 Row 21
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 618
- Points
- 113
I'm scheduling some visits now.
Thanks in advance for your recommendations.
Thanks in advance for your recommendations.
I'm scheduling some visits now.
Thanks in advance for your recommendations.
I'm scheduling some visits now.
Thanks in advance for your recommendations.
I actually hope they do stay undefeated til we play them. Would love the chance to stomp on their dreams.
If they win out until we play them, they would have already clinched a Rose Bowl. Even if we beat them, we wouldn't exactly be stomping out their dreams. They'd still be Rose Bowling. Kind of like in 1990 when we beat them in the dome, but they still clinched the Rose Bowl.
I can stomach Iowa's run because I respect Ferentz. Now if Bielema was marching to a national title..... It wasn't so bad when Barry Alvarez was winning.
If they win out until we play them, they would have already clinched a Rose Bowl. Even if we beat them, we wouldn't exactly be stomping out their dreams. They'd still be Rose Bowling. Kind of like in 1990 when we beat them in the dome, but they still clinched the Rose Bowl.
Pasadena. Confront your demons.
AKGopher, I am curious how you can respect K. Ferentz? I think his actions in the rape cover up are inexcusable and he should have been fired. It proves that Iowa cares more about football wins than this co-eds safety. Also he had 30 arrests of his playes with little discipline.
http://deadspin.com/5027393/university-of-iowa-athletic-staff-conspired-to-cover-up-a-sexual-assault
Whatever happened with that case? I remember the regents actually investigated whether justice was obstructed.
Please tell, what were Kirk Ferentz's inexcusable actions in the "rape cover up"? That thing has been investigated and reinvestigated (by independent investigators), and there was no wrongdoing by Kirk Ferentz. He adhered to university policy to a T. He covered up nothing. There was no cover up. Period. The university policies were found to be inadequate and too rigid, but Ferentz didn't create the university policies. Per the independent investigations, I believe there were a lot of inaccurate assertions initially made by the understandably mad parents of the victim. The accused players were immediately suspended from the team, then kicked off.
As for 30 arrests with little discipline, tell that to the many players he has booted from the team for being arrested. I don't know about the "30" arrest assertion being some kind of an accurate count, but a large majority of those were public intoxication charges and underage drinking charges. So the man doesn't kick players permanently off the team for making a youthful mistake which results in a public intoxication or underage drinking "arrest" (many of those "arrests" were citations), that clearly makes him Jack the Ripper. You know nothing of the punishment he dishes out.
here is an article that states 26 players arreseted/cited over a 26 month period. KF has an attitude that this trend is no big deal. His son was cited 2 times in less than 6 months and gets only suspended during the off season. If he cant control his own son, then why would the other players stay out of trouble. Iowa had to hire a director of player developement because of all the problems.
The cover up is that KF was in the 5 person panel that advised her not to go the formal route for this rape but to handle it within the university. Nothing was done for 5 weeks until the mother went to the police. Also KF transfered the players to the same dorm, just down the hall. If he didnt cover up the rape he should have immediately suspended the players. He didnt do that until it went public. That is why he is in my opinion a loser of a person.
http://m.desmoinesregister.com/news.jsp?key=479461&rc=sp
I can stomach Iowa's run because I respect Ferentz. Now if Bielema was marching to a national title..... It wasn't so bad when Barry Alvarez was winning.
By the way, since suspensions don't seem to be enough punishment in your eyes AV Gopher for underage drinking and other non-violent alcohol related offenses, how do you feel about the Gophers not even suspending Gary Tinsley for the same offense?
Thanks for the link, just the example I was trying to make. So Kyle Calloway, a 5th year senior with an exemplary record at Iowa, makes a mistake and drives his moped with a a blood-alcohol level of .106. Yes, I know its illegal in Iowa to drive with a a blood-alcohol level above .08, and he deserves whatever punishment the law prescribes. However, its not exactly like the guy is a hardened criminal. You would think that "counseling and educational requirements, extensive community service obligations and game suspension prior to returning to the field," which is what Ferentz handed out, with be sufficient additional discipline wouldn't you?
By the way, the article says "he is at least the 26th Hawkeye football player known to have been charged or ticketed by police since April 2007." Note the subtle distinction between "arrested" and "ticketed". Under age drinking, the kind that the Gopher hockey team was shown on Fox 9 (hack reporting if you ask me) to engage in, gets you a PAULA citation, not an arrest. If that is the sign of an out of control program, so be it, but its not like the 26 arrests were all rape and robbery. More serious offenses have been met with permanent dismissal from the team.
As for his son, his first offense was a PAULA citation. He wasn't drunk, but rather had possession of a can of beer when he was under the age of 21. Did you ever commit that crime? For that, he was suspended for the season. Not just redshirted, suspended so he couldn't participate in team workouts, activities, etc. That is pretty harsh, but his timing stunk as his dad was fed up with these problems. His second offense was public intox--not very bright James Ferentz, not very bright. He was suspended from spring practices (which hurts his development a lot having missed fall practices), and a crapload of other discipline. Should we hang him also?
As for Ferentz being part of a panel that advised the victim not to go the formal route for rape, I don't think that is an accurate depiction. Ferentz has stated he wanted nothing to do with being a part of the Universities' handling of the matter. I think it was stated that the victim wanted to keep it quieter, which probably isn't out of the norm for a victim of a rape crime like this, and that she wanted Ferentz involved. Isn't Ferentz supposed to advocate for his players? Asking him to be involved in the handling of an allegation (one that I believe, but still an allegation not a conviction) puts Ferentz in an unfair position with a conflict of interest. Your assertion that he didn't immediately suspend the players is false. He didn't publicly announce the suspensions until the matter became public. They were immediately suspended, and later kicked off the team for good. Believe it or not, even accused rapist probably have some rights. What is Ferentz to do, personally change the locks on their dorm rooms leaving them homeless without any trial, hearing or investigation? Kirk Ferentz probably doesn't handle dorm assignments, and he definitely didn't transfer the players to a different dorm room.
The independent investigation reportedly had zippo to say negatively about Ferentz. It was a university problem.