gophmeister
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,204
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
...is it possible Tyler Martz might reconsider an offer from us?
Marz would be a great kid to get. We'd be extremely heavy in offensive line recruits for this year, but that can even out over the years. Kids this big with this much upside don't come around that often.
Interesting if Chryst and the oline coach go.
I won't be "right" until it's officially official, but it sure looks that way.
And check the talk about Fangio. As is turns out, Manny Diaz (DC for Mississippi State) is in Austin this morning. I'd be happy with either Diaz or Fangio. But I'm most excited about getting Chryst and Bostad. Talk about two huge hires to help with Texas' offensive struggles.
Like I said before. There's no more need of the use of "if" when talking about Chryst and Bostad to Texas. It's a done deal.
.
When this happens its won't be the death blow to Wisconsin that many of you are hoping for. Teams at the top level of college football tend to have fairly high turnover at the coordinator positions. Sure it can set them back for a year or two, but they usually rebound nicely. This is especially true for schools who know who they are and what they want to do.
When this happens its won't be the death blow to Wisconsin that many of you are hoping for. Teams at the top level of college football tend to have fairly high turnover at the coordinator positions. Sure it can set them back for a year or two, but they usually rebound nicely. This is especially true for schools who know who they are and what they want to do.
Either the DC or the OC in one year, along with a position coach or two, would have been much more manageable. Both within a couple of weeks? That could be tough.
Bingo.
You can't rip Brewster endlessly for "constantly" switching coordinators, then get to say "no big deal" if/when Butt loses both in the same offseason. It doesn't work that way.
Top level? Wisconsin isn't exactly Alabama, Auburn, Texas or USC or even really Penn State or Ohio State for that matter.
"Death blow" may be a bit extreme, but I disagree this won't have significant impacts, at least initially. This isn't Austin, Columbus, or southern California we're talking about. Wisky had a really nice season but they aren't at the level where an elite coordinator is going to "lateral" into that position to Madison, Wisconsin. If that were the case, why would Chryst take a lateral "OUT" of Madison?
Yes, I would expect them to fill those positions with guys that are capable but from a continuity aspect, there will be some fall off. Either the DC or the OC in one year, along with a position coach or two, would have been much more manageable. Both within a couple of weeks? That could be tough.
It will not be smooth, but I tihnk for Wisconsin the bigger challenge will be replacing the departing seniors rather than the coaches.
I agree with you but it should be noted that changing coordinators is not the same as changing systems. The transition would be easier if wi. hires from within but you could still expect some drop-off.
You're right, but there are two options with the new hires: they either run the same system or they don't. If they don't, it's obvious there will be some growing pains. If they do, what are the chances they will be immediately as good at their jobs as Chryst, Doeren, Bostad, etc. were after being in the system for 5-6 years? Slim to none. Either way, there has to be a drop-off. There just has to be.
"Death blow" may be a bit extreme, but I disagree this won't have significant impacts, at least initially. This isn't Austin, Columbus, or southern California we're talking about. Wisky had a really nice season but they aren't at the level where an elite coordinator is going to "lateral" into that position to Madison, Wisconsin. If that were the case, why would Chryst take a lateral "OUT" of Madison?
Top level? Wisconsin isn't exactly Alabama, Auburn, Texas or USC or even really Penn State or Ohio State for that matter.
"Death blow" may be a bit extreme, but I disagree this won't have significant impacts, at least initially. This isn't Austin, Columbus, or southern California we're talking about. Wisky had a really nice season but they aren't at the level where an elite coordinator is going to "lateral" into that position to Madison, Wisconsin. If that were the case, why would Chryst take a lateral "OUT" of Madison?
Yes, I would expect them to fill those positions with guys that are capable but from a continuity aspect, there will be some fall off. Either the DC or the OC in one year, along with a position coach or two, would have been much more manageable. Both within a couple of weeks? That could be tough.
yep, this was the year for WI, and congrats to them, they took advantage of it. Now they have a rebuild on hand replacing seniors, those leaving early, and coaches. May not be a long rebuild, but this is probably reality for most B10 schools.
Wisconsin is a top level school in CFB. I agree not on a level with Alabama, OSU, Texas, Florida, or USC
These two statements are contradictory.