Hey legal guys, please weigh in on Darian Mensah

[Bob_Loblaw]

Who would the players be "bargaining" against? Any answer you provide will be easily explained away as "not happening", but alas, I'm sure you'll try anyways.

It's hard to imagine how it looks but maybe the conferences?

 

[Gophergrandpa]

TRO until a non-biased court hearing. Original judge recused himself as a Duke booster. We’ll see what happens. What damages would you suggest are appropriate if an employee jumps ship? That is generally defined in a contract. Wasn’t here. “Irreparable harm” to a wealthy institution like Duke with dozens and hundreds of replacement players at the ready to publicize the school just as well - appear at fan engagement activities, give interviews and represent the school in games - seems histrionic.

Right?

Correct about a TRO, which is temporary, essentially, emergency relief. All a TRO does is stop the supposed bad guys from taking further action in derogation of the petitioner’s (Duke’s) alleged rights until there can be a hearing on a preliminary injunction, with full briefing and argument. So, Mensah and Miami are currently being held in suspension awaiting a further decision from the court on a permanent injunction. That is the full extent of “enforcement” at this stage of the proceeding.

Even if Duke gets a permanent injunction (which keeps the “status quo” in place during the upcoming litigation), there won’t be a decision on the actual merits until a trial or, more likely, a pre-trial summary judgement motion. Because the creaky wheels of justice grind slowly and expensively, IMHO this matter will be settled by the parties, through negotiation, probably soon after a decision is made on the preliminary injunction (which often presages the ultimate outcome on the “merits” of the case). Despite the TRO being granted, it isn’t a sure thing that Duke actually gets a preliminary injunction. To get “equitable” relief (an injunction instead of just some $$), Duke will have to show irreparable harm—which might be quite tough given the phony commercial value of NIL contracts, and the ready availability of QBs in the portal and from HS recruiting. The fat lady hasn’t sung yet.

 

[upnorthkid]

As I said, how is it possible under current law to allow employment ... just for P4 football and basketball players, but not any other players in any other situation under the NCAA??

And if you make that happen ... minimum 95% of NCAA varsity athletics departments close shop. They can't afford and/or will refuse to pay wages and benefits to student-athletes.


@Pompous Elitist at least have the honesty to acknowledge this rock and hard place. You won't have any answers on how to solve it, no one does.

Pretty sure they can collectively bargain the deal with whoever they want to, the same as the players can decide to or not. So it would like be schools that opted into the house settlement collective bargaining with a group of athletes. Schools can say we’ll only sign you if you’re in the CBA. Players can choose not to. No mobility restriction as playing sports is a privilege not a right and they have reasonable alternatives without a restricted market/monopoly. You can keep non revenues/olympics outside of the CBA and thus revenue sharing as they currently are

The schools don’t want this as it makes the players employees with rights and protections, and that’s the far bigger hang up than the sweet spot many have now taking your (spoken generally, not specific to you) money to foot the costs to pay Jonny to come here and catch or throw a ball

 

[GopherTheJugular]

It's hard to imagine how it looks but maybe the conferences?

But then who goes first? Like, why would the B1G athletes want to lock themselves into "restrictions" while the SEC sits idle and lets their athletes continue with unlimited restrictions? And what would the motivation be for the SEC to try, now that they have a recruiting advantage over the B1G?

 

[GopherTheJugular]

Schools can say we’ll only sign you if you’re in the CBA. Players can choose not to.

And that's what the best ones will do, they'll sign in a different conference. And then it'll just be analogous to before NIL:

Before NIL: B1G schools make you go to class and SEC doesn't.

After NIL: B1G schools make you be a part of CBA, SEC doesn't.

Now they get their advantage again.

 

[upnorthkid]

And that's what the best ones will do, they'll sign in a different conference. And then it'll just be analogous to before NIL:

Before NIL: B1G schools make you go to class and SEC doesn't.

After NIL: B1G schools make you be a part of CBA, SEC doesn't.

Now they get their advantage again.

I think that’s why it’s been slow is you need enough of a tide so it’s not competitive advantage but the big schools in both conferences like the version where they have all the money and donors and stay in power

 

[GoodasGold]

To me, this seems like a situation where the relief the Court can grant is likely limited to just monetary damages. In law school, you learn about "specific performance" of a contract and how in some circumstances, Courts can or can't grant specific performance.

For example, I sign a contract to purchase 10 eggs from a farmer, the Court could theoretically order the farmer to ship me 10 eggs if he fails to do so. Now where it gets tricky is ordering specific performance for services, such as the services an athlete provides. Once the relationship is severed, how on earth do you order specific performance? You can't force someone to play quarterback at a school they don't want to. I guess the Court could issue an injunction to stop the quarterback from playing at the other school? But that seems a little far fetched. Most likely would just be restrained to monetary damages.

How about “loss of affection” damages?