studied the loss of revenue from football attendance to the monies received from the B10 for football TV revenue. Just a guess but they may balance them selves out or even show an income increase. Of course the ideal is to have sold out revenue plus the TV income which some schools do.
Rog; Not exactly sure what you are asking but would guess that yes, every Big Ten school showed an increase in revenue. Captain 07 had a good point. Minnesota, and all other B1G schools should have seen profits go up as well.
Here is a survey from 2016 focusing on he '14-'15 school year. It shows the revenue for each school
WITHOUT the BTN money.
Minnesota is the only school where the writer doesn't list Football profit, only expenses, and
tOSU football isn't separated out.
"Who are richest and poorest Big Ten football programs?
So, what does each Big Ten school make on its own? Specifically, what sort of money does each reap on gross revenue from football, the cash cow of all college sports? It's all listed on mandatory U.S. Department of Education filings and it's a wide disparity from lowest to highest. You might be stunned at how unequal the haves and have-nots would be if not for the collective TV deal, set to mushroom even more with the next contract signing in 2017, half of which will reportedly be dealt to Fox.
Here are the figures for what each Big Ten school does on its own, its gross football revenue earnings during the last fiscal year available (July 2014-June 2015).
14. Purdue: $17.1 million - After expenses,
Boilermaker football netted less than $1.5 million in profit during fiscal 2014-15, also a league low. The men’s basketball program actually turned a larger profit (almost $3 million).
13. Rutgers: $26.9 million -
Rutgers football cleared only about $6.8 million in profit during fiscal 2014-15.
12. Indiana: $27.5 million -
The football program did manage to cut a $9.5 million profit.
11. Illinois: $30.8 million -
But for now, UI football is getting by on about $12.5M profit last fiscal year.
10. Maryland: $30.9 million -
But it’s been a tough slog up to now – just a $14.8M football profit last year.
9. Northwestern: $31.7 million -
Wildcat football actually turned a $10.8M profit last fiscal year with the second-lowest paid attendance average in the league (38,316 in 2014 season).
8. Minnesota: $35.8 million - Under deposed AD Norwood Teague, the football program listed expenditures of $26.3M, a surprisingly high number relative to revenues collected
7. Wisconsin: $44.8 million -
Wisconsin football made $18 million in profit that year.
6. Iowa: $52.4 million -
Kirk Ferentz’s football program made a $26.9M profit in fiscal 2014-15 which does not even account for its unbeaten regular season last year.
5. Michigan State: $59.2 million -
MSU football made a $21.5M profit in fiscal 2014-15 which, paired with $7.1M made by Tom Izzo’s hoops juggernaut, put Michigan State athletics on firm footing even before the conference’s broadcast rights payout.
4. Nebraska: $60.6 million -
Nebraska is one of only four B1G football programs that turned a >$30M profit in fiscal 2014-15 -- $31.4M to be exact.
3. Penn State: $71.3 million -
Ohio State, which played two extra games because of the 2014 Big Ten championship and the College Football Playoff semifinal, was still second to PSU in football expenses at $32.6M.
2. Ohio State: $83.5 million -
Its net profit was a massive $51 million. Adding in the ample $15.1M profit of Thad Matta’s basketball program, Ohio State athletics netted $54.6M across the board even after accounting for money-losing “non-revenue” sports.
1. Michigan: $88.3 million -
Wolverine football netted a staggering $56.6 million in fiscal 2014-15.
https://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootball/index.ssf/2016/06/who_are_the_richest_and_poores.html#0