OK, the pitchfork crowd is out in full force. I get that MN has lost its first 2 Big Ten games and hasn't looked very good so far in non-conf. I would argue that this does not justify a CBJ firing either mid-season, or at the end of the season.*. None of the following listed below are Ben's fault.
--Expecting MN to win regularly with no NIL available (2020, the Univ. did not embrace it, turned their nose up) is not realistic. Historically we've relied on catching lightning in a bottle or cheating the system, as we've done historically as the only way to field a great team.
--With revenue sharing coming next year, MN will have a much more favorable position as a landing site for transfers and recruits. The program can be built up and highly competitive overnight with CBJ or another coach. Having tasked CBJ to build a team with limited money just isn't realistic. A coach has to be judged on a level NIL playing field with other P5 conferences.
--With a class of Payne, Ola-Joseph, Carrington, Christie, Hawkins, is it CBJ's fault that they left MN? With Payne, he got coached up, and then went with God's plan and took the money at Texas A&M. Christie got coached up, played his way into the lineup, and turned pro as 46th (?) pick, making $1M/yr that MN didn't have. Would have been a very interesting rotation had they $tuck.
--For the most part this year, the incoming transfers have underperformed. Is it CBJ's system, or are they just not as great as hoped?
--It is not a just move to fire a coach that has only dealt with a handicapped, changing system at MN. As the revenue sharing starts next year, if MN fires him, a new coach inherits all the benefits of money that CBJ did not have. Before the payments were allowed, Tubby exposed the handicap with the facilities at MN.
MN now has beautiful facilities, (yes The Barn is iconic), can "wow" recruits as an urban campus, and next year will have money to buy the players away from conferences in a less favorable position--The Big Ten, SEC, Big12 will get the top players, while other conferences will slowly die. (ie. ACC, BIGEast). It is ultimately up to the University to spend the money on the programs it values most...
*This depends on how they play as this season progresses. An undermanned team that competes hard is ok in my book until we build the talent up with money coming in 2025.
Its ok if I get blasted sticking up for CBJ. I just want to see the coach have tools to win. MN will have what it takes, and then if the Gophers can't compete, by logic you would assume its a coaching/talent evaluation issue. You can't say, "I just want to win. Look at our record(s). Coach controls everything." I don't think its that easy to find teams with less NIL than MN bb that have done appreciably better in P5. Leave that to the experts. I could be wrong. Just a fan doing opinion.