Not yet. They are using the data from the College Football Data Warehouse, and that shows a Wisconsin win. I emailed the person in charge of that site, and provided him with the links to the two newspapers.
This just shows what kind of mess you get when people don't check facts. It's more work to clean up errors than to avoid the error in the first place. A 1901 document and an 1894 yearbook showing a Wisconsin win are enough to merit further research, but not enough to reach a conclusion. All that it took was looking up newspaper articles to confirm that the 32-4 Minnesota win was correct all along.
While the original researchers should have done a much more thorough job, the U shouldn't have accepted such such flimsy evidence. Hands up anyone who thinks the Badgers would have accepted such flimsy evidence if the U had offered it? This isn't an issue of dire importance, but perhaps it shows that maybe the U could stand to be a little less credulous. It doesn't do to have the U be so readily accommodating to Wisconsin. "Trust but verify".
