highwayman
Knows Less Than PJ Fleck
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
- Messages
- 8,030
- Reaction score
- 1,725
- Points
- 113
Last edited:
And a LB and another WR while they’re at itthat is awesome.
Also it may not be dumb to grab an OL or two to wrap it up.
Why would you just compare Daniels to Turner? Obviously overall the incoming transfers offer far more value then the guys leaving via the portal, on paper anyways.I'm impressed with our portal navigation to date but this is similar to when we have a top ranked class early in the season due to the number of recruits committed.
Highest rated commit so far is Turner at 0.88. Phillip Daniels was re-ranked at 0.91 as a transfer so technically we're losing a better player than we are replacing them with....just trying to add some context here.
I think this is where some of the parity in College Football will level out. MN for example can go out early and identify players they want. They can be forthcoming with what they are willing/able to pay. "Take it or leave it, we are managing a salary cap and this is what we value your position at." Everyone on the team knows what they are getting into and I feel that some helmet schools are going to run into a lot more locker-room issues with possible disparities in salaries. Will be interesting to monitor.Give it a few more days … PJ is always out of the blocks early, for very good reasons. The Gophs will drop out of the top 10 like an anchor once the helmet schools wrap up all the top player auctions they are slogging through. Having said that, I am extremely happy with the Gophers’ portal signings to date.
Honest question. What process goes into giving transfers a rating?I'm impressed with our portal navigation to date but this is similar to when we have a top ranked class early in the season due to the number of recruits committed.
Highest rated commit so far is Turner at 0.88. Phillip Daniels was re-ranked at 0.91 as a transfer so technically we're losing a better player than we are replacing them with....just trying to add some context here.
Good question. There can't be much to go on to evaluate guys like Cabana.Honest question. What process goes into giving transfers a rating?
Probably a lot of the same guesswork/projection that goes into high school rankings. Use the kids ranking as a recruit, decide if he is better or worse now and rank accordingly.Honest question. What process goes into giving transfers a rating?
Because that’s a story about the ranking of our transfer class in a vacuum and I was pointing out that we’re currently in line to be losing a higher level talent than anyone we’ve signed so it’s misleading. I don’t know how to break it down further for you.Why would you just compare Daniels to Turner? Obviously overall the incoming transfers offer far more value then the guys leaving via the portal, on paper anyways.
I think there is a pretty good write up on 247 about it and if I’m recalling correctly, a 0.90 or thereabouts is the equivalent of a four star and is projected to be an nfl talent. A five star is projected to to be a future first rounder, so they only award 32 of them per year.Honest question. What process goes into giving transfers a rating?
I don’t think it’s really misleading. Yes it doesn’t give you the full picture of the roster, but they rank what you bring in, just like with high school recruiting, they don’t say yeah but look at who is leaving early and graduating.Because that’s a story about the ranking of our transfer class in a vacuum and I was pointing out that we’re currently in line to be losing a higher level talent than anyone we’ve signed so it’s misleading. I don’t know how to break it down further for you.