Hollinsanity
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 1,108
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 38
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We win this by waaaaay more than 7
As long as Tanner can play.
Without Tanner we should still win by much more than 7.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Should. I understand the line though. We've always had a hard time at Northwestern, and we may have to play a QB that might make as as one dimensional as we've been in previous years.
This Northwestern team is as bad as Fitz has had and isn’t that much better than Rutgers IMO and whoever is at QB will still have multiple NFL WR’s to throw too.
Line makes no sense and we don’t even know if Morgan won’t play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Single digit losses @Nebraska, @Wisconsin, and Purdue. Rutgers hasn't lost a B1G game by less than 4 touchdowns. Cut the hyperbole.
Single digit losses @Nebraska, @Wisconsin, and Purdue. Rutgers hasn't lost a B1G game by less than 4 touchdowns. Cut the hyperbole.
I don't care what the spread is.
Go to Evanston and punch the Cats' in the nose.
Get the MoJo back, move back into the top 10.
I don't care what the spread is.
Go to Evanston and punch the Cats' in the nose.
Get the MoJo back, move back into the top 10.
Minnesota will not earn a top 10 spot w/ a win over Northwestern.
They need to run up the score on UW to earn that spot.
Top 10 with wins over both, regardless of the score.
Alright, taking the Gophers line for the 4th time this season... 3-1 so far...
If this will be your 4th time betting on the Gophers, how are you 3-1?
Is there any news about how Pat Fitzgerald feels about about this spread?