Gophers are expected to hire Stanford defensive coordinator Bobby April as its new rush ends coach.

For the record:

Not a single post on this thread of mine says its ridiculous to have a DE coach. It isn't ridiculous and many teams at high levels do it. I support it.

I don't even know if I would say it is ridiculous to re-label a DE or OLB coach as "Rush ends coach". But it is definitely a Fleck-ism, very much on brand.
Gotta disagree with you — there have been rush end coaches whether they are labeled that or not going back 40 years.
 


Gotta disagree with you — there have been rush end coaches whether they are labeled that or not going back 40 years.
"Whether they are labeled that or not" is the entire, sole point. It's a tiny, weird, pedantic point. That's the kind of guy I am.


As always, take this with whatever grains of salt you want.


Prompt:
To what extent is the term rush end used in football and is it a less formal term compared to defensive end?

Answer:
“Rush end” is a real term, but it’s situational and informal compared to “defensive end.” It describes a role, not a roster position.

Here’s the fuller breakdown.

“Defensive end” (DE): the formal position​

  • Standard roster position at every level of football.
  • Appears on depth charts, contracts, stat sheets, and rulebooks.
  • Traditionally part of a 4–3 defense, aligned on the line of scrimmage.
  • Expected to:
    • Set the edge vs. the run
    • Rush the passer
    • Sometimes drop very shallow (rare)
When someone says defensive end with no qualifier, they mean a base-down position, not a situational specialist.

“Rush end”: a functional role, not a position​

“Rush end” is used to describe how a player is being used, not what they are officially listed as.

Typical characteristics:
  • Primary job is pass rushing
  • Usually deployed in obvious passing situations
  • Often:
    • Wider alignment (9-tech or even ghost-9)
    • Freed from run-fit responsibilities
  • May come from multiple listed positions:
    • Defensive end
    • Outside linebacker
    • Hybrid EDGE player
So a “rush end” is basically:

“This player is acting as an edge pass rusher right now.”

Where the term is commonly used​

You’ll hear “rush end” most often in:
  • Coaching and scouting language
  • Film rooms
  • Broadcast analysis
  • Hybrid defenses (3–4, 2–4–5, 4–2–5, NASCAR packages)
Examples:
  • “We kicked him inside and brought in a rush end.”
  • “He’s their best rush end on third down.”
  • “That package uses two rush ends and a nose.”
You will not usually see:
  • “Rush End” on an official depth chart
  • Contracts listing a player as a rush end
  • Box scores using the term

Relationship to “EDGE”​

In modern football, especially the NFL:
  • EDGE is becoming the semi-formal umbrella term
  • “Rush end” fits underEDGE, emphasizing:
    • Pass-rush-first
    • Reduced run responsibility
So roughly:
  • Defensive End → formal position
  • EDGE → hybrid position classification
  • Rush End → situational usage description
 





Yes it is called something different -- outside linebacker or defensive end.

If I'm wrong I'm wrong, but guessing we're the only P4 team in the country with a coaching title called a "Rush Ends coach". On the other hand, would not be surprised if a lot of teams have fulltime coaches who are the OLB or DE coach.

It's Fleck. He probably spends an hour a day writing down ideas for new terms or slogans in a little notepad.
You're embarrassing yourself. Again and again and again.
 

According to google the Ravens, Texans and Broncos employ a "Rush Ends" coach. It also said Bobby April III was recently hired by the Vikings so not sure how reliable that was
 






"Whether they are labeled that or not" is the entire, sole point. It's a tiny, weird, pedantic point. That's the kind of guy I am.


As always, take this with whatever grains of salt you want.


Prompt:
To what extent is the term rush end used in football and is it a less formal term compared to defensive end?

Answer:
“Rush end” is a real term, but it’s situational and informal compared to “defensive end.” It describes a role, not a roster position.

Here’s the fuller breakdown.

“Defensive end” (DE): the formal position​

  • Standard roster position at every level of football.
  • Appears on depth charts, contracts, stat sheets, and rulebooks.
  • Traditionally part of a 4–3 defense, aligned on the line of scrimmage.
  • Expected to:
    • Set the edge vs. the run
    • Rush the passer
    • Sometimes drop very shallow (rare)
When someone says defensive end with no qualifier, they mean a base-down position, not a situational specialist.

“Rush end”: a functional role, not a position​

“Rush end” is used to describe how a player is being used, not what they are officially listed as.

Typical characteristics:
  • Primary job is pass rushing
  • Usually deployed in obvious passing situations
  • Often:
    • Wider alignment (9-tech or even ghost-9)
    • Freed from run-fit responsibilities
  • May come from multiple listed positions:
    • Defensive end
    • Outside linebacker
    • Hybrid EDGE player
So a “rush end” is basically:



Where the term is commonly used​

You’ll hear “rush end” most often in:
  • Coaching and scouting language
  • Film rooms
  • Broadcast analysis
  • Hybrid defenses (3–4, 2–4–5, 4–2–5, NASCAR packages)
Examples:
  • “We kicked him inside and brought in a rush end.”
  • “He’s their best rush end on third down.”
  • “That package uses two rush ends and a nose.”
You will not usually see:
  • “Rush End” on an official depth chart
  • Contracts listing a player as a rush end
  • Box scores using the term

Relationship to “EDGE”​

In modern football, especially the NFL:
  • EDGE is becoming the semi-formal umbrella term
  • “Rush end” fits underEDGE, emphasizing:
    • Pass-rush-first
    • Reduced run responsibility
So roughly:
  • Defensive End → formal position
  • EDGE → hybrid position classification
  • Rush End → situational usage description
Good grief, really?
 








Top Bottom