Ski U Mah Gopher
Member of the Tribe
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 7,909
- Reaction score
- 1,217
- Points
- 113
UW for Wisconsin & UDub for WashingtonUW means Wisconsin to me and most Minnesota folks. I think we need to say UWashington or Washington
UW for Wisconsin & UDub for WashingtonUW means Wisconsin to me and most Minnesota folks. I think we need to say UWashington or Washington
The trainer.Who is Ronni--I don't see that name on the roster or among the coaches?
Who is Ronni--I don't see that name on the roster or among the coaches?
That's probably Miranda Wucherer.Ah, got it. The athletic trainer and the strength coach. Neither are volleyball staffers, but work with the team.
Who is the person standing to our right (p.o.v. of the picture) of Nao? (IE, on Nao's left)? Blonde, does not appear to be on the roster.
She's done though? Maybe just helping the team out because they're so short-handed this spring?That's probably Miranda Wucherer.
My guess would be the academic advisor. But, I don't know who that is.Ah, got it. The athletic trainer and the strength coach. Neither are volleyball staffers, but work with the team.
Who is the person standing to our right (p.o.v. of the picture) of Nao? (IE, on Nao's left)? Blonde, does not appear to be on the roster.
Definitely looks like the elder Wucherer. https://gophersports.com/sports/womens-volleyball/roster/miranda-wucherer/20505My guess would be the academic advisor. But, I don't know who that is.
My thoughts exactly.She's done though? Maybe just helping the team out because they're so short-handed this spring?
Thanks
I sure hope Wucherer is playing 6 rotations this year. She's too good to be a 3 ro player, imo.OH - Wucherer with DS
Based on what?I sure hope Wucherer is playing 6 rotations this year. She's too good to be a 3 ro player, imo.
True that the roster tends to get updated pretty quickly when/if someone transfers out.She's still listed on the spring roster.
View attachment 23523
Totally disagree. If you have a DS who is BETTER than your front row player, sure. But using a DS who is less talented or evenly talented is absurd. Wucherer has the talent to be a great defensive player, similar to Wenaas. Not only that, she seems to have the competitive fire which needs to be on the court at all times.Based on what?
In women's college volleyball, with how man substitutions you're allowed, it makes absolutely no sense for a front row player to not be subbed out for a defensive specialist unless your offensive gameplan utilizes backrow hits (which are much more rare in the women's college game, and aren't really necessary).
Specialization is what wins championships, with those rules.
If there were much fewer subs, then I agree that finding OH who are also very skilled at playing defense and serve receive would be important.
I don't know, I've been wondering this too. I would hope the athletes would prefer the loyalty and commitment to development from coaches like Cook/McCutcheon, however it just seems like the top players in the portal are going to the top 2-3 schools so they can get their natty. So will it be the same teams developing the players and then them leaving after a few years to go get a championship?So, the B1G is shaping up as a portal all star conference, particularly NE, PSU, and WI (TTA just committed today). Question - do teams like MN need to do the same to compete? Personally, I'd prefer to build the traditional way and supplement with an occasional transfer to fill a need (as opposed to bumping a starter or rising player to the bench). But now I'm wondering if you can compete that way?
I agree with you that it’s becoming more difficult for teams like the gophers to compete for a national title when all the top players leave for Texas, Nebraska and Wisconsin. I think Nebraska is a perfect example of over loaded talent with top recruits year after year, then they add transfers. How long will those underclassmen ride the bench?I don't know, I've been wondering this too. I would hope the athletes would prefer the loyalty and commitment to development from coaches like Cook/McCutcheon, however it just seems like the top players in the portal are going to the top 2-3 schools so they can get their natty. So will it be the same teams developing the players and then them leaving after a few years to go get a championship?
I think MN can compete and be a top 10 team, but can we win it all this way? I hope so, but not so sure anymore.
Some say the top coaches are just playing the game, but I don't think they have to play the game this way. I don't think they're honoring their current athletes by continually recruiting over them.
Yeah, I don't think I would if I was in those shoes.Why would any high school player commit to Wisconsin? They have one eye on you and one eye looking for your replacement.
Agreed 100%.Yeah, I don't think I would if I was in those shoes.
There was a discussion about this on the Badger VT page. Supposedly Sheffield had told Lauren Carlini that he would continue to recruit competition for her spot, and her response was "good luck". While I love that swagger, I have to wonder how many HS recruits would be like that. Look at Ella Wrobel who was the #11 recruit nationally last year and barely played. Now, she is being pushed deeper on the depth chart. Also, I can't see it helping the team culture.
Personally, I hope this kind of cutthroat team construction fails, but after TX's success last year, who knows?
I would say the extra covid year and scholarships running out (see OSU) is one factor. But that's a very good question.Agreed 100%.
Thing is: volleyball has always had a one-time free transfer rule. It was just sports like football and basketball that used to make you sit-out. "Lesser" sports, they didn't care.
So why weren't we seeing these all-star teams before?
True.I would say the extra covid year and scholarships running out (see OSU) is one factor. But that's a very good question.
Look at Ella Wrobel who was the #11 recruit nationally last year and barely played. Now, she is being pushed deeper on the depth chart.
I'm with you 100%, although I admit my dislike of WI/Sheffield is a factor. That said, if MN was scooping up all of the top portal transfers, I would still dislike the practice.That seems to be the ONLY way Texas could win a title. They finally made the team Elliot-proof.
Count me in the group that hopes this sort of stuff causes programs to crash and burn. It's borderline unethical (and may not even be borderline).
Nil money might have some baring on it also. If you can find money to fund a player for a year you don’t need an open scholarshipI'm with you 100%, although I admit my dislike of WI/Sheffield is a factor. That said, if MN was scooping up all of the top portal transfers, I would still dislike the practice.
Would be interesting to know what NIL deals the starters have at Neb, Texas, and Wisc.Nil money might have some baring on it also. If you can find money to fund a player for a year you don’t need an open scholarship