MplsGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 36,668
- Reaction score
- 10,148
- Points
- 113
Volleyball and Women's basketball are obviously not money grabs. I like the top 16 hosting in WVB and WBB-neutral sites were blah or oddly not neutral. But that's a discussion separate from RPI. And technically, the NCAA only chooses half the field the others are auto bids.
The funny thing about RPI (a house of cards build on no foundation) is that it's how we talk about rankings. A good move by the NCAA five or six years ago was when they started releasing RPI numbers regularly. They used to drop them seemingly randomly late in the season and they inevitably contained surprises.
Now, the NCAA begins regularly releasing RPI sheets about six weeks into the season which I assume influence the few human polls. Releasing the RPI Team Sheets and RPI Nitty Gritty reports weekly (in WBB they sometimes come out every day) for better or worse normalized RPI. All the conversations around Strength of Schedule, record versus top 25, top 50 and top 100 etc are based on RPI. Those dreaded losses to above 200 and 300 teams are all creations of RPI. Strength of conferences is probably the most vilified of the RPI rankings; but we still toss it about.
Anyway, it seems coaches are comfortable with RPI. They never seem comfortable with ranking systems which include the most essential stat: margin of victory.
Side note: Hockey uses the Hockey RPI version to choose the 16 tournament teams. Top 16 in and everyone else is out.
Are there even 16 hockey teams?? Kidding (kinda ...)