Gopher Basketball Recruiting Class Rankings since 2012

SanDiegoGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
1,909
Reaction score
1,534
Points
113
2012 (Tubby last year) Ranked 75 National, 11 B1G, .8643 avg

2013 (Richard Pitino era start) 91 National, 11 B1G, .8498 avg
2014 64 National, 9 B1G, .8593 avg
2015 34 National, 6 B1G, .9012 avg
2016 30 National, 5 B1G, .9269 avg
2017 71 National, 11 B1G, .9184 avg
2018 45 National, 8 B1G, .9254 avg
2019 37 National, 4 B1G, .9031 avg
2020 54 National, 9 B1G, .9181 avg

2021 (BJ era starts) 94 National, 12 B1G, .8921 avg
 

Nice work. Wonder how these teams finished in the B1G those years as well.
 

Nice work. Wonder how these teams finished in the B1G those years as well.

Thanks, if you average it out it gets a bit interesting.

Pitinos average national class rank while here was 53.25.

If the making the tourney was based on the talent you recruit alone, we should have been in the tourney each year (if people understand what I'm trying to say).

His B1G class average ranked 7.8 and there are 14 teams in our conference.

That's kinda wild because it's almost at the 50% mark ranking wise.

Again, these are averages I just took. But the numbers and results are interesting to analyze.

Do we set this as the "recruiting" bar for Ben as far as, can he recruit better? Not wins and loses, just hey, he's getting better classes.
 

If the making the tourney was based on the talent you recruit alone, we should have been in the tourney each year (if people understand what I'm trying to say).
I don't think that math is quite right. Taking account of all the automatic qualifiers for smaller conferences, there are only 42 spots available to P6 teams (36 at-large and 6 AQs).
 

Thanks, if you average it out it gets a bit interesting.

Pitinos average national class rank while here was 53.25.

If the making the tourney was based on the talent you recruit alone, we should have been in the tourney each year (if people understand what I'm trying to say).

His B1G class average ranked 7.8 and there are 14 teams in our conference.

That's kinda wild because it's almost at the 50% mark ranking wise.

Again, these are averages I just took. But the numbers and results are interesting to analyze.

Do we set this as the "recruiting" bar for Ben as far as, can he recruit better? Not wins and loses, just hey, he's getting better classes.
What if his recruits win more games no matter the rankings !
 


If the making the tourney was based on the talent you recruit alone, we should have been in the tourney each year (if people understand what I'm trying to say).

Not true. You're forgetting about all the automatic bids. Most of those would have recruiting rankings below #53. There aren't 53 at large bids available in the NCAA tournament.
 









Top Bottom