Definitely a little better than I expected. A team that the Gophers had last year would have dropped those games with Garcia out. Luckily, it was against lesser opponents and were playing as a team. But those kind of wins still build confidence. We can shoot, we run and we can hit our free throws. The defense needs to improve, but that'll get a boost once Carrington comes back. I would say 10-11 Big Ten wins this year.Going into the Big Ten season, the Gophers team is?...
That's why we took the damn field!They are who we thought they were!
.....not going to be playing on weakling Wednesday.
I'm with you on this analysis. I was thinking 6-8 BT wins with the new guard guard improving along the year #24.I'd say about what I expected. I thought they had the talent to win 7-8 games in the Big Ten and I still think that is the right range. One thing I like better than I thought is their ability to shoot. One thing I don't like as much as I hoped is the defense. That needs to get better as does their ability and patience to feed the post. This could be a 10-11 win team if they can get those two things squared away.
Only reason I think they can win more now is the Big Ten doesn't look great.It might be...but I guess I would rather enjoy it while it lasts. If they are as bad as I thought they were going into the year I will have plenty of time to whine about that later. Its like worrying about whether Johnson comes back as coach next year no use stressing about that now that will play itself out.
I personally don't think they are going to win as many games as some do but I wont dismiss that they might and I will remain hopeful they can.
Definitely a little better than I expected. A team that the Gophers had last year would have dropped those games with Garcia out. Luckily, it was against lesser opponents and were playing as a team. But those kind of wins still build confidence. We can shoot, we run and we can hit our free throws. The defense needs to improve, but that'll get a boost once Carrington comes back. I would say 10-11 Big Ten wins this year.
Given the awful non-conference schedule and the relative weakness of the conference, they likely need 12 B1G wins to make the tournament.I'm with you on this analysis. I was thinking 6-8 BT wins with the new guard guard improving along the year #24.
How many are we thinking it takes to get in the tourney? 10 wins? 11? 9 even?
I'm hoping, thinking, maybe this team wins 9 BT games. We will see but if they want to show they are improved beating Michigan tomorrow would be a good start.(and a winning BT record for the time being).
Two good things happened in non-conference, the loss to Missouri and Dawson’s injury at the right time.
The team learned a lot about how tough you need to be to hold a lead after choking on Mizzu. Winning without Garcia was a big boost to team confidence.
Mmm, I'm gonna have to, uh, disagree with you there. A lot of teams actually played a schedule that gives us a clue, i.e. multiple teams with a pulse. Regarding the Gophers, yes, a mystery....like the rest of college basketball, still largely a mystery.
Everybody learned. Players, coaches, ball boys and trainers. Even the whiners are nervous now.Losing to a bad Missouri team was a good thing? How do we know they've learned anything? They are 1-2 against teams with a pulse since that game. We haven't even done what you said. They were trailing the entire SF and OSU game, and blew out Nebraska after trailing big. Unless you want to say we learned how to not choke against Maine and Arkansas Pine Bluff. But those teams just flat out suck.
If the Mizzou game teaches us anything, it's hopefully that Johnson doesn't play stall ball and cost us another game with poor coaching.
Everybody learned. Players, coaches, ball boys and trainers. Even the whiners are nervous now.
Nope, learning what it takes to hold a lead. When all is done intelligent people will see there was value in that game. Those like you will not.Learned how to lose to a bad team? Okay... Them losing that game didn't really have a bearing on really any outcome after that, so this is just some spinning BS for the apologists.
Nope, learning what it takes to hold a lead. When all is done intelligent people will see there was value in that game. Those like you will not.
Missouri is not a bad team. They are a mediocre team with talent similar to ours. But people can and do learn from mistakes and adversity.You are able to learn that without actually losing to a bad team ya know. But by all means, keep spinning a bad loss into a positive.
Missouri is not a bad team. They are a mediocre team with talent similar to ours. But people can and do learn from mistakes and adversity.
As opposed to the full on twirl job you are doing? Are you even reading the posts you are responding to? There is a difference between a "good loss" and "learning from a loss". No team wants to lose but sometimes beneficial things can come from a bad loss.Learned how to lose to a bad team? Okay... Them losing that game didn't really have a bearing on really any outcome after that, so this is just some spinning BS for the apologists.
As opposed to the full on twirl job you are doing? Are you even reading the posts you are responding to? There is a difference between a "good loss" and "learning from a loss". No team wants to lose but sometimes beneficial things can come from a bad loss.
(and I am not an apologist)
I said Missouri loss had value to the team because they learned something about the toughness it takes to hold a lead down the stretch under great pressure. That was borne out at Ann Arbor.I specifically responded to someone saying the Missouri loss was in fact "good". I disagree. If Missouri was a good team, maybe it would be different, but it's a Q3 loss, and a ding on our current resume.
I said Missouri loss had value to the team because they learned something about the toughness it takes to hold a lead down the stretch under great pressure. That was borne out at Ann Arbor.
They played so shi77y that Mich came back and w…wait, I just looked and we actually won the game.Did you watch the last 4 minutes of the Michigan game? After the under 4:00 timeout we played like shit. 3 turnovers, 3 fouls, missed the front end of a one and one and Michigan had a wide open 3 to take the lead with 10 seconds left. Got outscored by 5 at this juncture of the game.