Game Day Revenue

Donate To GopherHole
MaxyJR1

MaxyJR1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
11,686
Reaction score
5,919
Points
113
Interesting if accurate. Just from games alone we are at least $11.2M to $16.1M behind our rivals in revenue each year.

 

This might be spot on BUT.

I've seen that university to university accounting is often NOT the same.

If any of the ADs or school leaders reading this want to chat about how to better capture the revenue you're giving away outside the Athletic Dept., shoot me a DM or email anytime, and let's chat!
Click to expand...

Uh is this just a sales pitch?

That makes me even MORE skeptical.

That whole tweet looks like someone's LinkedIn is leaking onto twitter...
 



Apples to watermelon. Every school does everything differently. Any possible source of data is from some basic form that each school self-reports. None of the “sources” cited have anywhere near an actual look at the AD’s financial books.

At the U, the AD doesn’t get to “count” a single cent of money collected to park any vehicle on any U owned parking facility as revenue for the department. That’s likely different from other schools.
 


To the point of the post, I believe parking revenue at the UoMN gets booked to the university and not the athletic department. I could be wrong. There are probably other items as well.

The analyst in me would be more interested in the net of revenue minus expenses including all-in infrastructure and maintenance costs. It takes a lot of money to support a gigantic aging stadium.
 



They didn’t do FOIA requests for every school here.

Again I question the source of information and how it was obtained.

Being a public school does not mean you are required to open your books to the public.
 



MplsGopher said:
They didn’t do FOIA requests for every school here.

Again I question the source of information and how it was obtained.

Being a public school does not mean you are required to open your books to the public.
Click to expand...
I would think based on stadium size and attendance that the order is likely accurate, but numbers may be a bit off. Based on ticket price alone, Michigan and tOSU are making $2M per game more than MN.
 

MaxyJR1 said:
I would think based on stadium size and attendance that the order is likely accurate, but numbers may be a bit off. Based on ticket price alone, Michigan and tOSU are making $2M per game more than MN.
Click to expand...
That is a great point.

Again why these are apples to watermelon numbers.


They should be normalized by attendance, to be average revenue per ticket sold. We’d still be way down, but at least fairer analysis.
 

MplsGopher said:
Apples to watermelon. Every school does everything differently. Any possible source of data is from some basic form that each school self-reports. None of the “sources” cited have anywhere near an actual look at the AD’s financial books.

At the U, the AD doesn’t get to “count” a single cent of money collected to park any vehicle on any U owned parking facility as revenue for the department. That’s likely different from other schools.
Click to expand...
This, all parking revenue for all sports events at the U goes to the University General fund.
 

MplsGopher said:
That is a great point.

Again why these are apples to watermelon numbers.


They should be normalized by attendance, to be average revenue per ticket sold. We’d still be way down, but at least fairer analysis.
Click to expand...

I don't think it's about being fair. Schools either get the bucks or not, regardless of the "average ticket price" and budget accordingly.
 



MaxyJR1 said:
I would think based on stadium size and attendance that the order is likely accurate, but numbers may be a bit off. Based on ticket price alone, Michigan and tOSU are making $2M per game more than MN.
Click to expand...
Indiana higher than us?
 

Word said:
Indiana higher than us?
Click to expand...
Maybe based on fans from nearby schools filling their stadium? Mich, Mich St, Pur, OSU, Penn St plus a Wisc crossover year, if you get 3 of those in a season that could have an impact.
 

MaxyJR1 said:
Interesting if accurate. Just from games alone we are at least $11.2M to $16.1M behind our rivals in revenue each year.

Click to expand...
Doesn't look like Required Scholarship Donations are included.
 

as I read Altimore's post, I think he is making a different point.

Some schools recover more income from game-day activities - parking, concessions, merchandise sales, etc. as I read it, the reason why MN is ranked lower is because some of those sources of revenue do NOT go to the athletic department or the football program - while at other schools, similar sources of revenue ARE counted as income for the athletic department or football program.

so the point is that schools like MN - if possible - should try to change the way that those sources of revenue are accounted for.

so for instance, if I go to a Gopher FB game and buy a sweatshirt, some food and pay for parking, that money should be used to benefit the athletic department or the football program - NOT go into some general fund account to make the administration's bottom line look better.

athletic programs at MN - to the best of my knowledge - get little or no support from the general fund - but the general fund then turns around and siphons off revenue from the athletic department.
 

short ornery norwegian said:
as I read Altimore's post, I think he is making a different point.

Some schools recover more income from game-day activities - parking, concessions, merchandise sales, etc. as I read it, the reason why MN is ranked lower is because some of those sources of revenue do NOT go to the athletic department or the football program - while at other schools, similar sources of revenue ARE counted as income for the athletic department or football program.

so the point is that schools like MN - if possible - should try to change the way that those sources of revenue are accounted for.

so for instance, if I go to a Gopher FB game and buy a sweatshirt, some food and pay for parking, that money should be used to benefit the athletic department or the football program - NOT go into some general fund account to make the administration's bottom line look better.

athletic programs at MN - to the best of my knowledge - get little or no support from the general fund - but the general fund then turns around and siphons off revenue from the athletic department.
Click to expand...
The general fund most likely paid for building the parking facilities, and pays to operate and maintain them.

The general fund therefore should get the revenue. Or do you also believe the Gopher Athletic Dept should get the revenue from the green line light rail on game days.
 
Last edited:


USAF said:
The general fund most likely paid for building the parking facilities, and pays to operate and maintain them.

The general fund therefore should get the revenue. Or do you also believe the Gopher Athletic Dept should get the revenue from the green line light rail on game days.
Click to expand...

the point is that it's not an even playing field. some schools recover a larger share of revenue from game-day operations and auxiliary activity, while other schools like MN recover a smaller share of revenue. If Neb gets a cut of parking, that gives them more resources than MN.

Football fans use the parking lot on game days. football fans purchase concessions on game days. football fans purchase merchandise on game days. that revenue would not exist if no game was being played. so I think it's fair that at least some of that revenue should go to the athletic department. Or - how about this - a share of those revenue sources go to the NIL collective?

the light rail is not running only for the football game. non football fans use the light rail on game days. so it is not specific to the game.
 

short ornery norwegian said:
the point is that it's not an even playing field. some schools recover a larger share of revenue from game-day operations and auxiliary activity, while other schools like MN recover a smaller share of revenue. If Neb gets a cut of parking, that gives them more resources than MN.

Football fans use the parking lot on game days. football fans purchase concessions on game days. football fans purchase merchandise on game days. that revenue would not exist if no game was being played. so I think it's fair that at least some of that revenue should go to the athletic department. Or - how about this - a share of those revenue sources go to the NIL collective?

the light rail is not running only for the football game. non football fans use the light rail on game days. so it is not specific to the game.
Click to expand...
I remember Norwood saying at one his talks to donors that even if schools like Iowa & Wisconsin had the same capacity as The Bank, the U would still be $3-4 million less in revenue to the athletic department than those two schools.
 

gregbrady said:
I remember Norwood saying at one his talks to donors that even if schools like Iowa & Wisconsin had the same capacity as The Bank, the U would still be $3-4 million less in revenue to the athletic department than those two schools.
Click to expand...
Hence, I presume, the Scholarship Seating that was implemented during his tenure.
 

Ope3 said:
I don't think it's about being fair. Schools either get the bucks or not, regardless of the "average ticket price" and budget accordingly.
Click to expand...
True but there was a part of the message talking about fans contacting their AD to suggest improvements.

You can’t contact Coyle like “hey you should convince 100k to come to Gopher football games, that will increase gameday revenue”.

But if we knew what the comparable gameday revenue per ticket sold was, then it would be a meaningful comparison to see if action is needed.
 

Ope3 said:
Hence, I presume, the Scholarship Seating that was implemented during his tenure.
Click to expand...
My understanding is Scholarship seating was always in the plans for new stadium even under Maturi. It was just first implemented under Teague. Sure seems like a lot of empties in the premium and expensive seats since that time. Does not seem that the Loge seats and suites are sold that well.
 

gopherdudepart2 said:
My understanding is Scholarship seating was always in the plans for new stadium even under Maturi. It was just first implemented under Teague. Sure seems like a lot of empties in the premium and expensive seats since that time. Does not seem that the Loge seats and suites are sold that well.
Click to expand...
I agree, it was going to happen regardless. It might have been more tempered to begin with under different leadership, but no doubt something would have been in place.
 

Ope3 said:
I agree, it was going to happen regardless. It might have been more tempered to begin with under different leadership, but no doubt something would have been in place.
Click to expand...
I think the Vikings premium seating liscense fees and suites along with stadium naming rights has really hurt the Gophers, ever since US Bank opened our premium seats and stadium revenues have declined. It's a smaller marker to have to support all the pro teams and major college sports. Sure seems like since Vikes added a lot more expense to premium seats and suites this has affected Gophers sponsorship and premium football seating. Sports fans have finite resources on spending. If they do remodel the bank they need to redo the premium seating areas in the stadium, too high up and not perceived value.
 

Ope3 said:
I don't think it's about being fair. Schools either get the bucks or not, regardless of the "average ticket price" and budget accordingly.
Click to expand...
His point wasn't about being fair, it's about having a more accurate (fairer) assessment to take out more of the obvious differences that are not accounted for, like stadium size.
 

Does anyone have recent data, 2022 or 2023, for actual attendance at Gopher football games? Hard for all the no-shows counted in the announced attendance to contribute to non-ticket game-day revenue.
 

BigTenGuy said:
Does anyone have recent data, 2022 or 2023, for actual attendance at Gopher football games? Hard for all the no-shows counted in the announced attendance to contribute to non-ticket game-day revenue.
Click to expand...
With the population of the Twin Cities our stadium should be 75,000 capacity. Why the low interest?
 


You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom