I took the post "Battle doesn’t." as meaning Battle literally doesn't or does very little. I don't think hyperbole is particular helpful and is overly critical of Katie in a backhanded way. Maybe that was the goal, I hope not. I think they are both phenomenal talents and have their strengths. I suspect Battle has more upside due to her size but I think they are both awesome!
I think most people know point guards will always get turnovers that is why the metric of assist to turnover was invented. Point guards should have a assist to turnover ratio at least 2:1 and niether Battle or Katie are there over the last 3 games (Battle is at 2.0 on the season due to her tremendous start). In the women's game the top 50 assist to turnover rates range from
8.0-2.44.
Yes, I would agree Katie has had more turnovers due to bad decisions but that will also be easier to improve upon. They both have turned it over too much lately (3 games) based on the 2.0 metric.
Assist/TO over last 3 games
Battle 5/4, 6/5, 5/3
Katie 5/3, 1/7, 5/4