Gophfan22
Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 8
Yeah, I don't see why that's a big deal, that certainly shouldn't be in the article's headline. I'm sure there are rules against it, but there's probably rules against letting a young lady you've spent some time with walk out of your apartment with one of your t-shirts and I'm assuming that happens more than once in a while. Getting discounts on cars based on your status as a football player, that's a different kettle of fish.Selling something you own, how terrible!
Selling something you own, how terrible!
Is boning skanky jersey chasers also a violation? By definition, jersey chaser boning is a privilege not afforded to the general student body.
It clearly sounds like a lack of institutional control. All of these "little" things add up to a major disregard for the rules. If it is this easy to find players says that everyone is doing it than the coaches did not even try to control the players or local supporters. Saying I told them not to do it is not an defense if it is that easy to see that everyone is doing it.
Selling something you own, how terrible!
I watch way too much TV, but I was watching Pawn Stars a couple of weeks ago and some guy brought in a pair of those gold pants pins that the OSU players get when they beat Michigan. I don't remember how much it was worth, but I think it was that the trinket went for around a $1000. And they weren't old, either. Like within the past 5 years or so. If I'm a college kid and I can get a hundreds of dollars for a little trinket, sold.
Now imagine if that same kid is still in school and some booster offers to buy it for $15,000. That's the issue. If they relax on rules like that, the schools will just keep offering athletes more and more gear, and more and more boosters will find them and offer them extraordinary amounts of money.
Selling something you own, how terrible!
+1
Having boosters pay players is the same as a booster paying over face value for goods that a player owns.
Not hard to figure out how that could get out of control.
Recruit: Why should I come to OSU?
Recruiter: Well, you'll end up alot of trophies, jerseys, trinkets, etc that you'll be able to sell to willing buyers across Columbus. Check out one of our player's dorm rooms. How do you think he payed for all of that stuff?
Do players buy these rings or are they given as a free reward by the institution?
Yes, seeing the NCAA banhammer come down on tO$U would provide some satisfaction for all conference members. However, assuming a USC-like reduction in scholarships, the (temporary) demise of Ohio State clearly benefits two teams: Wisconsin and Michigan. Both teams recruit heavily in OH and both stand to benefit from a weakened Ohio State--especially, Michigan. In addition to that, Wisconsin's road to the Big Ten Championship would become a heckuva lot easier. With the Leaders division already more top heavy than its counterpart, Wisconsin could make a run to the Rose Bowl with only a single victory of significance, not counting the B10 Championship.
While it will add more parity, a weak OSU would simultaneously bolster the strength of a divisional power and remove the primary obstacle for our biggest rival. Major sanctions could be a net loss for us.