BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,126
- Reaction score
- 18,627
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
And that’s not a hard argument to make... I assume he is doing so voluntarily as a way of pitching in and taking one for the team though...Totally get it, maybe more cuts like this to come. But it would be nice for the university to throw him a bone right now (not monetary) and acknowledge what an outstanding job he and his staff are doing given the circumstances. I think you could make the argument that they are the top recruiting staff in the country over the last month.
The optics of him taking the pay cut and being able to advertise it is worth more than the money.And that’s not a hard argument to make... I assume he is doing so voluntarily as a way of pitching in and taking one for the team though...
Back then my wife had to take a permanent 10% pay cut. My brother who is an exec at a large company just had to take a 20% pay cut for at least 2 months.1 week is roughly 2% of salary. Back in 2008-2009 the company I worked for asked for senior leaders to do the same. It was labeled "voluntary" but it was pretty obvious that it was expected.
I'm not sure what number you used for your calculations, but using his salary of $4.6M, a one-week furlough works out to $88,461.54 in lost salary.The pay cut comes as a one-week furlough. That means for that week, PJ is not allowed to work. My hunch is he will take that one-week furlough closer to June. Right now, he is working hard.
To put the fulrough into perspective (I think my math is right here), his one-week pay cut (pre-tax) will be roughly $75k. That's more than many make in a year (pre-tax).
Back then my wife had to take a permanent 10% pay cut. My brother who is an exec at a large company just had to take a 20% pay cut for at least 2 months.
Things could be worse for PJ considering the financial hit the athletic department may take.
Dude! Now that's the dpodoll68 we know and love! Down to the penny.I'm not sure what number you used for your calculations, but using his salary of $4.6M, a one-week furlough works out to $88,461.54 in lost salary.
I'm not sure what number you used for your calculations, but using his salary of $4.6M, a one-week furlough works out to $88,461.54 in lost salary.
The pay cut comes as a one-week furlough. That means for that week, PJ is not allowed to work. My hunch is he will take that one-week furlough closer to June. Right now, he is working hard.
To put the fulrough into perspective (I think my math is right here), his one-week pay cut (pre-tax) will be roughly $75k. That's more than many make in a year (pre-tax).
Umm, no way pj isn't working. You think he punches a clock??
I have family who work at the U who are apart of this furlough. They are merely not getting paid for a week's worth of work rather than taking a week off.This. He absolutely is working through whatever week he takes his furlough. Even if not being compensated for it.
I have family who work at the U who are apart of this furlough. They are merely not getting paid for a week's worth of work rather than taking a week off.
I'm not sure what number you used for your calculations, but using his salary of $4.6M, a one-week furlough works out to $88,461.54 in lost salary.
Well of course Minnesota is leading the charge to be the first one to furlough its head football coach all while having the greatest recruiting week in the programs history! I get it, but will the rest of the Big follow?
For what I was told, they are working their furloughed week without pay.So they are working? That doesn't sound right at all.
This. He absolutely is working through whatever week he takes his furlough. Even if not being compensated for it.
As long as PJ is on board with it, then great! That’s commendable and as someone whose wife works for the U... I appreciate his sacrifice!
If it was mandated and it annoys him... that’d be about as short sighted of a move as anybody ever makes.
I presume we are in situation #1 here, so I’m just going to say “Thank you PJ!”
It's basically not really a furlough. It's a temporary pay cut.I have family who work at the U who are apart of this furlough. They are merely not getting paid for a week's worth of work rather than taking a week off.
It’s a pretty minimal move, a 2% pay cut. Some health systems are cutting executive level pay 20, 30% or more. If the U wanted to show a real effect they would’ve cut at least 10% from all the top paid executive level staff (especially coaches).
So they are working? That doesn't sound right at all.
It’s a pretty minimal move, a 2% pay cut. Some health systems are cutting executive level pay 20, 30% or more. If the U wanted to show a real effect they would’ve cut at least 10% from all the top paid executive level staff (especially coaches).