Joel might be a very nice guy, but the results have been very poor during his tenure at the University of Minnesota.
It's always interesting to see how differently people look at someone's leadership. When I look back over the past nine years, I think he's done pretty well.
When Maturi arrived in mid-2002, the financial condition of the athletic department was bleak and darn near everyone was convinced that two or three non-revenue sports would have to be trimmed. The department now runs in the black and no sports have been terminated.
When he arrived, Glen Mason was in his fifth year. In Mason's 7th year, the team had a 10-3 record -- a marked improvement over past years. While you and I might feel that he should have eased Mason out a year earlier than he did, there were only three seasons of "mediocrity" and he took action after the third less-than-substantial season. However, the two seasons after the 10-3 season were winning seasons.
When Maturi arrived, Monson was in his fourth season (2002-03). Two years later (2004-05), the team made it into the NCAAs for the first time since Clem's tenure. While again you and I may have felt that he should have pulled the trigger after the 2006-06 season, he pulled it early in the following season (and raised all sorts of eyebrows outside the state of Minnesota doing so during pre-conference).
When Maturi arrived, Lucia was in his 4th season as head coach. In Maturi's first year, the hockey team won the NCAA Championship for the second straight year. During Maturi's tenure, the team held 1st place for two seasons in the WCHA and progressed to the NCAAs every year but last. You might argue that Lucia should have been fired last year -- I disagree. I'm still unsure about how this year should be handled as the season is still incomplete.
As to the other non-revenue sports -- which are still a part of the athletic department over which Maturi has responsibility -- Minnesota has historically performed well in the Directors Cup and during Maturi's tenure, the University has maintained that level of performance.
He's not the perfect A.D. -- I'm not sure such a person exists except in the nostalgia of memories after about 15 years of time have passed. But he's been a very good A.D.