Just because you don't agree with a newspaper article does not make it biased or one-sided.
there was a complaint against the U, and it is being investigated. That is news, and the Strib (and every other media outlet) is going to cover it. admittedly, some outlets will give it more play than others, but it's still news. If it has a negative impact on fund-raising, that is not the Strib's problem.
Also, title XI is a fact of life, and every AD in college sports understands that (or should understand it). A man who practices against the women's basketball team is not a female athlete - and trying to count them as a female participant looks bad, whether it is common practice or not.
IMHO, what this comes down to is that the women's and minor sports had a friend in Joel Maturi. when Teague took the job, somebody should have spelled it out to him that the non-revenue sports enjoyed a certain status under Maturi. If Teague had been smart, he would have made sure that somebody - if not him, someone else in the office - paid some attention to the non-revenue sports to keep them happy. Instead, he has apparently helped create an atmosphere where someone was angry enough to file a complaint. Teague, at the very least, bears some of the responsibility for the current situation.
When all is said and done, the new facilities are going to be built, and some accomodations/adjustments will be made to satisfy the women's and non-revenue sports. This is not the end of the world. It's unfortunate, but it could have been prevented with a little more foresight from the AD's office.