ESPN: NCAA proposes rule to let schools, athletes enter NIL deals

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
62,125
Reaction score
18,621
Points
113
Per ESPN:

NCAA president Charlie Baker proposed rule changes Tuesday that would allow Division I schools for the first time to pay their athletes in ways that are not tied to educational resources.

Baker shared the proposed changes in a letter sent to member schools. If Division I schools choose to adopt the rules, they would be allowed to enter into name, image and likeness deals directly with their athletes. The new rules would also create a trust fund for athletes at the richest tier of athletic departments and allow those schools to create its own set of rules for recruiting, transfers, roster size and a wide range of other policies.

"[It] is time for us -- the NCAA -- to offer our own forward-looking framework," Baker said. "This framework must sustain the best elements of the student-athlete experience for all student-athletes, build on the financial and organizational investments that have positively changed the trajectory of women's sports, and enhance the athletic and academic experience for student-athletes who attend the highest resourced colleges and universities."

The policy would bring a major change to the foundational tenet of NCAA's long-held business model that prevented schools from providing any non-academic-based compensation to athletes. Baker's letter said the change is necessary during a time when the revenue generated by top colleges is poised to grow significantly, and the legal pressure to compensate athletes continues to mount.

He wrote the new policy would help gender equity by demanding that schools provide equal NIL investments for their men's and women's teams on campus. The proposed new model would require the top tier of schools to set aside at least $30,000 per year for at least half of its athletes in "an enhanced educational trust fund."

The letter doesn't define a line for which schools would fall in that top-earning subdivision, but instead says the new framework would give schools the option to decide. The top schools, which according to letter are more impacted "by collectives, the Transfer Portal and NIL," would be allowed to create their own set of rules to help police those areas of the market for college athletes in unique ways.


Baker said in the letter that these new rules will help provide a model to show to Congress in the NCAA's ongoing quest for new federal laws to help in governing college sports. Baker and other NCAA leaders have been asking Congress for three years to create a law that would allow them to keep college athletes from becoming employees, create uniform rules for NIL deals and avoid future antitrust lawsuits. Those efforts have so far failed to gain significant momentum, with several key lawmakers telling the institutions that they need to make efforts to solve their own problems before the government intervenes.

Baker, who took over as the NCAA president in March, has said multiple times during his tenure that he believes the highest-earning echelon of college sports operates in a different reality than the overwhelming majority of NCAA schools.

"[This proposal] kick-starts a long-overdue conversation among the membership that focuses on the differences that exist between schools, conferences and divisions and how to create more permissive and flexible rules across the NCAA that put student-athletes first," he said. "Colleges and universities need to be more flexible, and the NCAA needs to be more flexible, too."


Go Gophers!!
 

Here is where I am lost on this...

"He wrote the new policy would help gender equity by demanding that schools provide equal NIL investments for their men's and women's teams on campus."

Sorry for not being sorry, but in D1 sports as it stands in the past, present, and most likely the future, very few eyeballs are on women's sports. This will be a poison pill provision in this proposal. The revenue generating sports at 90% of schools are men's football, men's basketball, and sometimes men's hockey. Then there are the outliers of big time women's basketball teams (UCONN, Iowa, Oregon, & South Carolina) and a few women's volleyball programs.

*And before you come at me about how great the Gopher volleyball program was last year (still somewhat good now with the new coach) they still lost over $2M with having the 4th best average attendance (4,782 per game) in the nation last year! - ARTICLE HERE *only Nebraska turns a profit in the entire NCAA for women's volleyball! *they even disbanded the Gopher Volleyball booster club.
 

Here is where I am lost on this...

"He wrote the new policy would help gender equity by demanding that schools provide equal NIL investments for their men's and women's teams on campus."

Sorry for not being sorry, but in D1 sports as it stands in the past, present, and most likely the future, very few eyeballs are on women's sports. This will be a poison pill provision in this proposal. The revenue generating sports at 90% of schools are men's football, men's basketball, and sometimes men's hockey. Then there are the outliers of big time women's basketball teams (UCONN, Iowa, Oregon, & South Carolina) and a few women's volleyball programs.

*And before you come at me about how great the Gopher volleyball program was last year (still somewhat good now with the new coach) they still lost over $2M with having the 4th best average attendance (4,782 per game) in the nation last year! - ARTICLE HERE *only Nebraska turns a profit in the entire NCAA for women's volleyball! *they even disbanded the Gopher Volleyball booster club.
Well said.

Posion pill, indeed.

Only the tip of the iceberg for the very predictable, unintended consequences of all this NIL, "student" athlete freedom, play for play nonsense. Reap what they sow. ... the Wild Wild West.
 


The NCAA wants us to believe they're by-standers in this charade of a "free market" (NIL) for the benefit of the athletes. I'm against the athletes getting paid millions, but NOT against the athletes being compensated beyond the free tuition, room and board, which is already worth a significant amount of money. A football player at MN receives $ 1,200/ month beyond tuition, room and board and allows for some spending money to offset their time commitment. The amount of money provided by TV and other sources is plenty for allowing some additional compensation for the players beyond the $ 1,200. Where I disagree with the current system is that the NCAA allows for unlimited payment to athletes as long as it's "NIL" compliant. This system allows an above-board 2-tier system, MN being the 2nd tier. Why not allow for use of TV revenue given to schools to be distributed evenly amongst the players. You can argue the annual payment amount, but it must be equal. The best coaches will still win, but the players transferring for money should subside. In addition, a player may transfer once-per-year for any reason.

With the current system "the rich get richer", meaning the top schools continue to win with the most money, the best coaches and the best players.
 
Last edited:


The NCAA wants us to believe they're by-standers in this charade of a "free market" (NIL) for the benefit of the athletes. I'm against the athletes getting paid millions, but NOT against the athletes being compensated beyond the free tuition, room and board, which is already worth a significant amount of money. A football player at MN receives $ 1,200/ month beyond tuition, room and board and allows for some spending money to offset their time commitment. The amount of money provided by TV and other sources is plenty for allowing some additional compensation for the players beyond the $ 1,200. Where I disagree with the current system is that the NCAA allows for unlimited payment to athletes as long as it's "NIL" compliant. This system allows an above-board 2-tier system, MN being the 2nd tier. Why not allow for use of TV revenue given to schools to be distributed evenly amongst the players. You can argue the annual payment amount, but it must be equal. The best coaches will still win, but the players transferring for money should subside. In addition, a player may transfer once-per-year for any reason.

With the current system "the rich get richer".
You can't do anything about NIL.

Any person has the right to make money off of their name, image, or likeness in this country. All 330 million of us.

The way it's being carried out in college football sucks for the teams without boosters willing to donate their money to collectives, but that"s too bad. No one gets to make a profit off of your name, image, and likeness without your say.

We'd all prefer legitimate opportunities like Caleb Williams gets in his television commercials, but that's not how the world works.

Suck it up, be a big boy, and realize what you liked was fraudulent. You could also donate your money, or create a political movement to radically change self-determination and capitalism.

There aren't other options.
 

the biggest issue hanging over the old model of the NCAA is the current court case. the NCAA's biggest fear is that athletes will be ruled as employees. from Ross Dellenger in Yahoo Sports:

The model is introduced as the NCAA and major conference schools are in the midst of settlement negotiations over what could be one of the most costly and impactful antitrust cases in college sports history. House v. NCAA, seeking as much as $3 billion in retroactive NIL and broadcasting revenue payments, is the latest lawsuit expected to chip away at the NCAA’s bedrock of amateurism.

The case will, undoubtedly, force the organization to distribute more revenues to athletes like those legal losses before it (cost of attendance payments in 2015 and Alston academic-related stipends in 2021). However, the House case is much more significant, as it opens the door for direct pay to athletes by seeking the elimination of the NCAA’s NIL rules.

Baker’s new model provides a pathway to prevent such legal challenges down the road and appeases congressional lawmakers amid the NCAA’s lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill.
They’ve asked lawmakers to both prevent college athletes from being deemed employees and grant the association a narrow legal protection so it can create more structure around NIL.
 

You can't do anything about NIL.

Any person has the right to make money off of their name, image, or likeness in this country. All 330 million of us.

The way it's being carried out in college football sucks for the teams without boosters willing to donate their money to collectives, but that"s too bad. No one gets to make a profit off of your name, image, and likeness without your say.

We'd all prefer legitimate opportunities like Caleb Williams gets in his television commercials, but that's not how the world works.

Suck it up, be a big boy, and realize what you liked was fraudulent. You could also donate your money, or create a political movement to radically change self-determination and capitalism.

There aren't other options.
LOL. It's my opinion.
 




Top Bottom