Governor Sibley
Section 109 Row 21
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 3,980
- Reaction score
- 595
- Points
- 113
Someday in the future, the old Big Ten will be a division in the new Big Ten.
Looks like Miami (OH) is coming off the schedule in 2016. Hopefully the buyout is small. We currently have four OOC games scheduled, and if we only have 4 conference home games in 2016 I'm sure they will do everything they can to keep the three OOC home games.In 2016 the east will get 5 home games on even years and the west will get 5 home games on odd years.
That will likely also throw a wrench in the Oregon State series for 2017 and 2018. Perhaps they can convince Oregon State to switch the home-away years, although my guess is that with 9 Big Ten games Kill will probably try to push to never play a BCS opponent in the non-conference again.
The league's athletic directors and presidents also approved a scheduling model that includes at least one team from a major FBS conference per year and no FCS teams. Delany hopes the model will be in place league-wide by 2016.
I saw that too, but wonder if there will be any enforcement mechanism. I agree with the no FCS deal (honestly there's so little to gain and almost everything to lose), but I'm certainly interested to see how well the supposedly mandatory BCS opponents goes over (or if they interpret teams like Air Force as "high level")Per the ESPN blog, it sounds like the AD's agreed to always schedule at least one high level (read: old BCS) opponent and no FCS teams moving forward:
Found this interesting.
"In the first 18 years, you're going to see a lot of competition between teams at the top of either division," Delany said. "We call that a bit of parity-based scheduling, so you'll see Wisconsin, Nebraska and Iowa playing a lot of competition against Penn State, Ohio State and Michigan. But it will rotate. Early on, we feel this gives the fans what they want."
Me too. Although I don't understand the significance of the first 18 years. If the are on a rotation then I don't get how they could weight more than the first several years.
If, after 2016, we never play New Hampshire, New Mexico State, or any team with "Dakota" in there name
Just making it harder for big ten teams to make the championship game...
New Mexico State is Division I-A. We will be seeing them again, I'm sure.
I don't understand my fellow gopherholers at all here. We don't want to play the tougher competition, but we don't want to play the supposedly easier FCS competition. Who do you want to play????? I want to play a Dakota and Michigan every year. Entice recruits with traveling to the horseshoe and happy valley twice, not Purdue and Northwestern.Thanks for catching that one Dpod. My knowledge of the mid-major conferences is pretty light, so I didn't realize that they were WAC. Still stand by hoping to not see FCS on our schedule ever again.
AO54 said:I don't understand my fellow gopherholers at all here. We don't want to play the tougher competition, but we don't want to play the supposedly easier FCS competition. Who do you want to play????? I want to play a Dakota and Michigan every year. Entice recruits with traveling to the horseshoe and happy valley twice, not Purdue and Northwestern.
It's a neutral site game. Just not the same. Can't recruit to something you haven't been to. If we're good enough to play them in the big ten title game, we're good enough to play them during the regular season.Playing in a Big Ten Championship Game will entice recruits. I'll take whatever gives us a better chance to get there and being in the opposite division of OSU and Mich is it.
One last game would shut there pie holes.
I think that you have grossly underestimated their pie holes.