Bob_Loblaw
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Messages
- 21,141
- Reaction score
- 17,062
- Points
- 113
The attrition hurt and definitely cost us a few wins per year, but we still didn't have the horses to be a top-tier team. Some scholarship players will be career back-ups and that's ok, they are still a vital piece of the program, but at the end of the day you need to get some all conference type players.
Jewhan Edwards was arguable our best defensive player in 2010. He had to go, he was a jerk of a person, but he was our best defensive lineman in 2010 and likely would have been in 2011.
Kevin Whaley started ahead of Bennett. I am not entirely sure he was much better than Bennett, but he certainly was right in that ballpark (in terms of ability, not attitude or dedication).
Brodrick Smith likely would have been our #1 or #2 WR. He led KState in receiving in 2010 before severely breaking his leg. He was a really good athlete, likely as good as McKnight.
Bryant Allen was one of our better returning WRs before he chose to transfer.
Tim Dandridge actually finished with a decent career at Jackson St., and has an outside shot of playing in the NFL next season (most NFL scouting services have him just behind Royston in rankings)
In a purely hypothetical world, if those guys were able to stay in school and play, we would have been a significantly better football. Each of them would have likely started (maybe not Whaley).
However, I do see your point. You need some big guns to compete in the Big 10. But my argument was that if you had 65 players contributing, the best players will rise to the top and we will have those big time performers. I really didn't expect that all 65 would be borderline backup / special teams contributors. Players are going to step up and be our "big dogs" and the players that don't need to find a role and excel in that role.