I love bottles of water. That makes perfect sense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's a guy on defense who seems more concerned with fat sacks than quarterback sacks.So Reusse tweeted about an "agricultural" problem
At the U, may lend credence to ongoing marijuana problems.
Now Doogie just responded to someone saying there are TWO fires to put out. What else besides Croft? Maybe Croft and separate marijuana issues are the two items?
There's a guy on defense who seems more concerned with fat sacks than quarterback sacks.
So Reusse tweeted about an "agricultural" problem
At the U, may lend credence to ongoing marijuana problems.
Now Doogie just responded to someone saying there are TWO fires to put out. What else besides Croft? Maybe Croft and separate marijuana issues are the two items?
There's a guy on defense who seems more concerned with fat sacks than quarterback sacks.
Right -- reporters have to verify, and still mighr choose not to report it for ethical reasons, depending on the issue. Here, there's no such accountability.For sure there is a lot of BS posted on here, but to be fair, a reporter has to put his name on a report and may not want to do that for a variety of reasons that will affect future relationships. A place like GH allows someone to do that anonymously which can be a benefit. You have to take the good with the bad I guess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just legalize it already
Does it rhyme with playon beavers?
By having your prize recruit for the next year suspended in high school for similar "personal" reasons?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who/what is this referring to?
From later in today's presser: "The way we talk about spirituality is believ in something bigger than yourself. That could be this water bottle. That could be the team. It doesn't have anything to do with religion."
Our QB commit Brennan Armstrong was suspended for the first three games of his season
I have no idea what happened but obviously Croft did something contrary to what Fleck demands. Kid isn't playing. Makes sense to me regardless of which rule he violated.Here's what has me confused. Fleck first said Croft would not play because he was dealing with "personal issues." That could be family issues, or it could be a behavior issue, like alcohol or drugs.
But then, Fleck went back to the culture discussion, where people won't play if they don't live up to the 'four areas.' that opens up more possibilities - including academics, or something "socially or spiritually."
So, all we know for sure is that Croft won't play for some reason. which could be any reason. It makes it difficult to assess how Fleck is handling the situation, because we don't know whether Croft did something serious, or he just crossed some hard-to-define line in the realm of "culture," which can mean almost anything Fleck wants it to mean.
And - to the people on this board. This is not a newspaper. There are no issues of journalistic ethics here. If you actually know something, tell us. If you don't know anything, don't act like you do. It just really bugs me when people come on here and do this routine: "I know something. I have the inside scoop. But I'm not going to say what it is." My gut tells me that 90% of the people who claim to have inside information are just blowing smoke out of their backside.
Here's what has me confused. Fleck first said Croft would not play because he was dealing with "personal issues." That could be family issues, or it could be a behavior issue, like alcohol or drugs.
But then, Fleck went back to the culture discussion, where people won't play if they don't live up to the 'four areas.' that opens up more possibilities - including academics, or something "socially or spiritually."
Here's what has me confused. Fleck first said Croft would not play because he was dealing with "personal issues." That could be family issues, or it could be a behavior issue, like alcohol or drugs.
But then, Fleck went back to the culture discussion, where people won't play if they don't live up to the 'four areas.' that opens up more possibilities - including academics, or something "socially or spiritually."
That would be a really big water bottle.
Here's what has me confused. Fleck first said Croft would not play because he was dealing with "personal issues." That could be family issues, or it could be a behavior issue, like alcohol or drugs.
But then, Fleck went back to the culture discussion, where people won't play if they don't live up to the 'four areas.' that opens up more possibilities - including academics, or something "socially or spiritually."
$HIT...![]()
Ditto that. We have essentially a rookie starting QB and a back-up with no experience.