Section201
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,523
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
scher
Obviously, I agree!
Agreed.
I do not think at this point it NEEDS to be replaced, currently Tubby Smith draws recruits without the flashy arena. I think he'd draw MORE recruits with this argument. "We play in an arena that has a great atmosphere and great tradition and is one of the most unique places in all of basketball, guys like Kevin McHale, Bobby Jackson, Voshon Leanord have all played in this arena. Also, we have a brand new state of the art practice facility for you to use 24 hours a day to get better, and one day you could be another historically great NBA player who has played here."
I do not think tradition / history plays a HUGE role for recruits who are 18, but I believe it does play some role when you can say this is where Kevin McHale, Trent Tucker, Bobby Jackson, Voshon Leanard, etc. played. Recruits do know who those guys are. Many recruits do care about money and flash and fast paced, etc. but there are still recruits who care about history and are students of the game, and often these are the types of players who can build programs.
I think the right thing for the U to do is keep the barn, build that practice facility, and be good to go until the majority of recruits start listing the barn as a top 5 reason they didn't come here.
As much as it pains many to give 18 year olds (and coaches for that matter) that power, they are the key to winning and they do own that power.
Obviously, I agree!