It’s far worse in the comments abyss of SBnation, Twitter, 247 but here are some suggestive comments from this thread:
“I assume that when you say "abuses" you arnt including McNair's death as one of the abuses, right?”
“This will get uglier. What parent will agree to have their son go to a school that sends a message that his life isn't valued so much.”
“have fun if you go there. Hope you don't die”
“Money matters more than lives, huh? Seems the regents are taking notes from the guys down the road in DC”
“Jordan McNair paid for this culture with his life.”
“Look man they just want a team of psychopaths that wouldn't really care or respond much to the death of a student ..”
Sorry, not a hit. Here is what you said in your post:
"the rage seems to be along the line of Durkin ran the kid until he died/murder."
So who said that or something close to that?
I think an perfectly good argument could be made that Durkin's sick culture contributed to an environment where something terribly rare, the death of an athlete, occurred. You might disagree, but distorting that into "the rage seems to be along the line of Durkin ran the kid until he died/murder." is simply exaggeration.