Sportsfan24
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 12,686
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 36
I couldn't believe this at first, but after some time to think about it I have come around. Here is what I think must be happening.
1. Obviously, they must think Gray's ankle will not heal sufficiently anytime soon to allow him to stay at QB. He had 4 weeks off after the injury, but re-aggravated it after just a couple quarters of being back in. High ankle sprains can be nagging like that, so it wouldn't shock me if it never
completely heals in the next 5 weeks.
2. That leaves Shortell. Between his inconsistent passing and concussion (which pretty much cuts
out any limited running he was doing), it seems there is not much left for him to contribute at this
time.
3. About running... Maybe they could play Shortell and not ever run him. Well once you do that,
you are changing the offense to suit what he can contribute. If he was a great passer then yes,
maybe you do that. But seeing how inconsistent he has been through the air, is it worth it to
change the offense to something it's not, while at the same time have it be horrible? That is a
lose-lose. By putting Nelson in you are running the 'real' kill offense which demands a dual-threat
QB. This is better for the entire offense for this year, and especially going into next.
So in a nutshell, the coaches must think by NOT having Nelson in, you are essentially wasting the last 6 games of the season by running what is not the real offense with mediocre results.
While I would hope our coaches were more creative offensively than what you suggest i do admit your scenerio is very plausible and would make sense to me....hope this is the case.