As a fan, I am certain I will like more B1G games. However, I have several concerns about how it will play out both in league power ratings and with the committee each year.
With fewer NC opportunities for all 14 teams, the total number of interconference games will be reduced and those that remain will have a higher impact on the league's yearly reputation. Figure most teams will be playing in the exempt tourneys along with a Challenge game and possibly one other top tier game. A loss in the 1st round exempt game can doom your SOS (see Nebraska).
The other big concern is what league record is considered "lock" worthy? Back in the 16 game schedule, 10-6 was nearly a sure thing. That only required winning 2 more road games than you lost at home. It is a .625 win %. I'm not sure if 12-8 (.600) will be enough. 13-7 is .650 and in some years, that might not be enough. 14-6 will surely be in, but how hard is that to accomplish?
Just thought I'd post and see what some of you thought.
With fewer NC opportunities for all 14 teams, the total number of interconference games will be reduced and those that remain will have a higher impact on the league's yearly reputation. Figure most teams will be playing in the exempt tourneys along with a Challenge game and possibly one other top tier game. A loss in the 1st round exempt game can doom your SOS (see Nebraska).
The other big concern is what league record is considered "lock" worthy? Back in the 16 game schedule, 10-6 was nearly a sure thing. That only required winning 2 more road games than you lost at home. It is a .625 win %. I'm not sure if 12-8 (.600) will be enough. 13-7 is .650 and in some years, that might not be enough. 14-6 will surely be in, but how hard is that to accomplish?
Just thought I'd post and see what some of you thought.