BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,711
- Reaction score
- 19,984
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
This is also why it's inexcusable to not be a top program every year. Stack up some wins and the money will coming pouring in. . .The only reason I can think we rank this high on this scale is because we are one of only two D1 programs in the state- so the Gophers certainly have something near a monopoly. It's the reason Rick Majerus said he would have loved to coach here.
Made up stuff!
Go Gophers!!
You can't I don't think but think about it...the Celtics cost $6 Billion more dollars. You gotta collect a lotta aluminum cans to get that kinda money.Maybe we should sell it.
My empty beer cans pay for my property taxes every year....You can't I don't think but think about it...the Celtics cost $6 Billion more dollars. You gotta collect a lotta aluminum cans to get that kinda money.
Badger Lover!!Joke, I thought it was going to be 15th in the B1G
Or Green Stamps lolYou can't I don't think but think about it...the Celtics cost $6 Billion more dollars. You gotta collect a lotta aluminum cans to get that kinda money.
We could get a Houston, give the football team $12 million, and build a brand new Dairy Queen on campus.Maybe we should sell it.
The nerds who calculated this don't understand college basketball.It makes more sense if you consider the approach.
"The numbers are the product of a regular study conducted by Brewer, who begins his research with a simple question: What would these teams be worth if they could be bought and sold like a pro sports team?
He answers it by studying revenues and cash flows while making financial projections about the team's sustainability. In a way, it's not different than it would be if he were analyzing the value of any other business."
This.This is also why it's inexcusable to not be a top program every year. Stack up some wins and the money will coming pouring in. . .
You _might_ have a drinking problem.My empty beer cans pay for my property taxes every year....
No explanation, no discussion, no apparent criteria?
Go Gophers!!
There are a bunch of articles out there breaking down the numbers but they usually end with the top ten valuations. I'm sure the actual WSJ article goes over methodology.No explanation, no discussion, no apparent criteria?
I want some analysis, not just a number!