Selection Sunday has done fantastic posts like this for tournament teams, and I thought I would try it for coaches. It might be obvious who these guys are, but please don't share if you know. All 3 of these guys actually coached in the same mid major conference
Candidate A: 12-6 in conference play this year. Will miss the NCAA tournament this year. Previous job: Low major head coach who went to two NCAA tournaments and won two regular-season titles in his 3 years on the job.
Notes in favor of Candidate A: Candidate A took over a program with a lot of turnover from the previous season and took them to a 12-6 regulars season including winning there last 5 games of the year. Candidate A had two of his transfers play major roles on this years team and has more talent coming in for the '20 season. Candidate A has by far the strongest track record as a recruiter of the 3 candidates as he's spent time on several high major staffs.
Notes against Candidate A: While his resume at his previous low major school is impressive, that school was winning at a high level in its league before he got there.
Candidate B: 11-7 in conference play this year. Will miss the NCAA tournament this year. Previous job: Mid/Low major head coach who had 3 winning conference seasons and one regular-season title in his 5 years.
Notes in favor of Candidate B: Candidate B was 11-7 in conference play this year with 4 of his top 5 players being his recruits even though he's in just his second season. His leading scorer was a Freshman and most of his rotation was Freshmen and Sophomores. Just 2 years ago, Candidate B reportedly beat out Candidate C for this mid major job. Candidate B left previous job(s) in better shape than he found them.
Notes against Candidate B: Candidate B has no real experience at the high major level and none as a recruiter. Candidate B has not coached his team to an NCAA tournament in his career.
Candidate C: 12-6 in conference play. Will go to the NCAA tournament this year. Previous job: Low major head coach who had 3 winning conference seasons and one regular season title in his 4 years.
Notes in favor of Candidate C: Candidate C will likely be going to his second straight NCAA tournament at his current job and his first season marked a significant turnaround for that program. Candidate C recruited one impact player who has has been a significant factor in what will be back to back NCAA tournament trips. While he did not make an NCAA tournament at his previous stop, he did leave the program in better shape than he found it.
Notes against Candidate C: His success at his current stop is largely tied to players he did not recruit including one current Senior who is one of the best players in program history. He has very little experience as a recruiter at the high major level having just spent a couple of years as an assistant at that level.
So who do you prefer Gopher fans? A, B, or C?
Candidate A: 12-6 in conference play this year. Will miss the NCAA tournament this year. Previous job: Low major head coach who went to two NCAA tournaments and won two regular-season titles in his 3 years on the job.
Notes in favor of Candidate A: Candidate A took over a program with a lot of turnover from the previous season and took them to a 12-6 regulars season including winning there last 5 games of the year. Candidate A had two of his transfers play major roles on this years team and has more talent coming in for the '20 season. Candidate A has by far the strongest track record as a recruiter of the 3 candidates as he's spent time on several high major staffs.
Notes against Candidate A: While his resume at his previous low major school is impressive, that school was winning at a high level in its league before he got there.
Candidate B: 11-7 in conference play this year. Will miss the NCAA tournament this year. Previous job: Mid/Low major head coach who had 3 winning conference seasons and one regular-season title in his 5 years.
Notes in favor of Candidate B: Candidate B was 11-7 in conference play this year with 4 of his top 5 players being his recruits even though he's in just his second season. His leading scorer was a Freshman and most of his rotation was Freshmen and Sophomores. Just 2 years ago, Candidate B reportedly beat out Candidate C for this mid major job. Candidate B left previous job(s) in better shape than he found them.
Notes against Candidate B: Candidate B has no real experience at the high major level and none as a recruiter. Candidate B has not coached his team to an NCAA tournament in his career.
Candidate C: 12-6 in conference play. Will go to the NCAA tournament this year. Previous job: Low major head coach who had 3 winning conference seasons and one regular season title in his 4 years.
Notes in favor of Candidate C: Candidate C will likely be going to his second straight NCAA tournament at his current job and his first season marked a significant turnaround for that program. Candidate C recruited one impact player who has has been a significant factor in what will be back to back NCAA tournament trips. While he did not make an NCAA tournament at his previous stop, he did leave the program in better shape than he found it.
Notes against Candidate C: His success at his current stop is largely tied to players he did not recruit including one current Senior who is one of the best players in program history. He has very little experience as a recruiter at the high major level having just spent a couple of years as an assistant at that level.
So who do you prefer Gopher fans? A, B, or C?