- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 5,172
- Reaction score
- 1,386
- Points
- 113
This is another one of those lights-out shooters that some people claim Tubby Smith doesn't recruit.
Devoe Joe was pretty good....
When you say sharp shooter, you hope someone will get you 45% or better from 3pt range. In today's game, really good teams have at least one of those guys, many have two, a few have three.
47 players out of how many at the D 1 level? Hundreds?
Dude, there are few 45% 3 point shooters in the country, much less 2 or 3 per team...
LaCrosse Tribune: Minnesota makes scholarship offer to Onalaska's Thomas
http://lacrossetribune.com/sports/h...cle_231ac0fe-aab2-11e0-8a84-001cc4c002e0.html
Go Gophers!!
I never said ALL teams have 2-3 sharpshooters from 3pt range. Read my post again. I said most really good teams HAVE AT LEAST ONE. Many have 2 (Purdue, Wisconsin). A few have 3 (OSU). And, yes, maybe 45% is lofty. But, certainly, most really good teams have multiple players who are over 40%. We had no one over 40% last year.
In other words, my point is - if we want to compete for a Big Ten title, we need at least one, more than likely will need two sharpshooters. If we get three, then super. Fact of the matter is outside of Hoffarber, we haven't had that.
Are you really going to continue to make stuff up? It's not even true that most good teams have at least one, unless you're counting players that shot over 45% but had very few attempts. I may have missed one, but the only really good teams that had at least one player who shot over 45% were OSU, Pitt, UK, Wis, and Wash. Very, very few have two. Purdue and Wisconsin didn't. Not sure where you got that idea. The only noteworthy team that had two (unless I missed one) was Kentucky. OSU had one player shoot over 45% from three, not three. If there is a team who had 3 players shooting over 45% from three, the team wasn't very good.