"Write an argument in favor of divisions in the Big Ten Conference in the voice of PJ Fleck"
ChatGPT:
"As the head coach of the University of Minnesota football team, I have seen firsthand the challenges and opportunities that come with competing in the Big Ten conference. In my opinion, the creation of divisions within the conference would be a positive step forward for college football.
Currently, the Big Ten is composed of 14 teams, which makes it one of the largest conferences in college football. This can make scheduling difficult, and it can also create imbalances in the conference standings. For example, a team in one part of the conference may have a much tougher schedule than a team in another part of the conference, which can affect their chances of making it to the conference championship game.
By dividing the conference into two or more divisions, we can address these challenges and create a more balanced and competitive conference. Teams would be placed into divisions based on geography or other factors, and they would play a round-robin schedule within their division. This would create more balanced schedules and give teams a better chance to compete for a division championship.
Furthermore, divisions would create more exciting and meaningful games throughout the season. Rivalries within divisions would be renewed and intensified, and the race for the division championship would provide added drama and excitement. This would benefit not only the teams and coaches, but also the fans, who would have more opportunities to see meaningful games and cheer on their favorite teams.
In short, the creation of divisions within the Big Ten would be a positive step forward for college football. It would address scheduling challenges, create more balanced and competitive conference standings, and provide more exciting and meaningful games for teams, coaches, and fans alike. I believe that divisions would be a welcome addition to the Big Ten, and I would support their implementation."