CBS' Gregg Doyel: Gophers' Jerry Kill wants to coach -- should it be his call?

I don't think that is what he is saying - Take someone who has had multiple lung problems caused by smoking. That person should probably not be smoking anymore. If eating McDonalds has caused multiple heart problems - maybe continuing to eat McDonalds isn't a bright choice.

If coaching a Big10 football team is truly causing you to have seizures, I think you have to ask the question if coaching a Big10 football team is something you should continue doing.

IMO, it is a fair question and one only Kill and the University can decide.

I actually think we agree by and large.

I do think it is fair for the University and Jerry Kill to have continued conversations about the condition, and how it may or may not impact the team. However, if Jerry is committed to coaching, and feels he can coach in spite of his condition, then we and the University can only evaluate him on the success of his team. If he does not perform as coach, i.e., does not produce the desired results and/or trends, then certainly we make a change. That is very different than forcing a decision upon him, which some media are proposing.
 

I don't agree with the people that think this is a non-issue. I think it is something that could very well affect Kill's ability to remain coach. That said, we certainly aren't going to fire him because he has epilepsy (at least not in the short term. It would have to become clear over and over that it is impacting the direction of the program. The whole 'his condition does not allow him to do his job' angle). So I've considered the following:

1) We now have a data point that indicates the team and the fans are normalizing this. The team clearly played BETTER in the second half and after WIU's score early in the second half, they dominated the game. The fans didn't freak out, the stadium staff didn't freak out, the band didn't freak out. The students chanted 'Jerry'. Contrast that with the awful atmosphere that permeated the stadium after the incident at the NMSU game. Never want to be part of that again, and based on yesterday, I don't think that's a concern anymore.

2) I think some accommodations can be made. Not sure if it's the booth, or what, but when we hired Kill we bought into his philosophy, which includes the longest tenured coaching staff. It's a package deal here, really. The staff knows him, his condition, and what to do. It's very possible Kill's whole organization is constructed in part because of their cohesiveness in situations like this that they KNOW will occur. Since we bought them all part and parcel, it would be stupid to quit on it before it clearly doesn't work.

3) While I have my doubts, I'm starting to get pissed at the media. Souhan's article was beyond the pale. Someday when he is old he will regret having written that. He should be canned for writing it. He goes way beyond asking responsible media questions and reaches conclusions that are offensive. Even in an opinion column that is inappropriate.

So basically, we're here, with a situation we would not like but there's no alternative that clearly improves it in the short term, so it's time to make lemonade out of lemons. If the team continues to improve, this is potentially a great story. If not, well, we'll deal with it given the benefit of time and more results to evaluate. We simply gotta go with that and support Kill like there is no tomorrow. Chant his name, and all the rest. If there ever was such a thing as a Gopher Nation (...errr, county?), now is the time to circle the wagons.

Again, I think we largely agree. I am not saying that epilepsy does not hinder his performance in any way. Obviously we want a coach on the sideline for every game. The ultimate question becomes whether or not the program is deemed successful. Should Kill and his staff consider alternate ways for him to be involved that a.) mitigate his in game stress; and b.) minimize the impact if he does leave the game? Absolutely. Again, our metric for success is going to be the success, or lack thereof of the program.

And this is more of a general comment, not directed at you per se, but it is ultimately a personal decision for Coach Kill and the University. Will there be public commentary? Probably, but I do not think it is pertinent in the end.

There should be a continuing dialogue between Kill and the University and what is best for everyone. At this point, I think it is fairly clear where the University and Jerry stand on this. So, the next criteria is judging success - absent any discussion of his health.
 

The U needs to come out with a strong, and I mean really strong, clear statement of unconditional support and commitment to their head football coach. Put this issue to rest immediately by saying it's a non-issue. Tell people that this job is his until he no longer wants it or his teams do not continue to improve. Period. End of discussion.
 





Top Bottom