I was so hoping that somebody with a national reach would pick up this game. New stadium, no coverage. If a recruit does not live in the BTN's small viewing area, they will not be able to see it. BTN's prime time numbers are terrible, very close to cable access. I'm exaggerating, but not by a ton. This might draw a few look-ins, but as soon as they show the B-roll footage, they will leave. I'm sorry to be a downer, but I could not picture a worse possible outcome.
You do realize that the BTN is in 70 MILLION homes across the nation, right? This is NOT local access. Some of the top rated cable TV shows in Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan are Big Ten Network football telecasts - ranking ahead of ESPN's Monday Night Football or any other cable TV show on some occasions in those states. In 2007, the top rated cable TV show in both Wisconsin and Ohio was a football game on BTN...ahead of anything at any time on ESPN, TNT, TBS, USA, CNN, etc.
In addition, one would have to assume that this will be the BTN's marquee game of the opening day, and we could see their college football crew here that day, as well as that corny show they do on Fridays. Every little bit helps.
I'm sorry to be a downer, but I could not picture a worse possible outcome.
A worse outcome would have been what would likely have happened pre-BTN. Then, the game would have been put on a local syndication that would have hit about 7 states and gotten no viewers. Instead, it can hit big portions of the country and be seen by anyone who really wants to see it.
I mean, how soon we forget. In 2006, we had TWO non-conference games that were not on television ANYWHERE. The game at Kent State was an internet feed and the home game against Temple had NO TV AT ALL. The Big Ten conference game against Indiana in 2006 - internet feed only - NO TV! In 2004 - back-to-back conference games against Illinois and Indiana - NO TV AT ALL!
So, please, don't tell us that a PRIME TIME Big Ten Network game - accessible in 70 million homes - is the worst possible outcome.