Brewster is my last hope

diefirma

Active member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
482
Reaction score
145
Points
43
I started watching Gopher football when I first came to town in 1968. I was dead broke but my mother-in-law was undergoing a career change and was a student at the U. so I would buy her tickets to attend the games in old Memorial Stadium. As my financial situation improved I upgraded my tickets and got out of the student section. Some years I should not have spent the money but I did anyway. I was a hard-core fan. Unfortunately for many years being a hard-core fan also meant being somewhat of a masochist. I have watched loss after loss. Some were heartbreakers, some were expected, none were easy. To make a long story short, Brewster will be my last coach. If Brewster cannot turn this program around I plan to move on.

For those of you who "don't want to settle for mediocrity" or think that Brewster is a "blowhard" and want to see Brewster fired I would say good luck. My father was a hard-core Iowa state fan and I have followed that program closely throughout the years. Since the mid-50s Iowa State has had 12 coaches and Minnesota has had 8 coaches. Of those 20 coaches only three had winning records; Warmath, Earle Bruce and Mason. That is a 15% success rate or a 10% success rate if you don't want to count Mason's creampuff schedule. Everybody thinks they're a coaching genius and know just whom to hire. Take the time to look at Dan Hawkins, Colorado's coach. In five years at Boise State coach Hawkins was 53-11 over all and 37-3 in conference games. How has he done at Colorado? I'll leave that as a homework exercise.

Has Brewster made mistakes? Of course! What did you expect? He had no head coaching experience. Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team. Moreover coach Brewster has shown the ability to recognize his mistakes and to correct them. The defensive coordinator left after the first year presumably with coach Brewster's encouragement. Dunbar and the line coach were fired when the offense proved unable to run the ball. Brewster has since hired two good defensive coaches - Roof and Cosgrove. All Brewster needs now is a good offensive coordinator and I assume if Fisch does not dramatically improve the offense next year he will be replaced as well. In the meantime the overall talent level will continue to improve. Will there be good years and bad years? Of course, to expect otherwise is naïve. Never-the-less the overall direction of the program is up. Brewster is clearly learning. He is a better head coach now than he was when he was hired. How good can he become? I don't know and I don't think anyone will know for at least a couple of years, maybe even 5 years. I would hope we would give him at least 5 more years but if we don't give him enough time to succeed and he is forced out then I'm out with him. I'm tired of watching the beatings and that 15% success rate doesn't bode well for a happy future.
 

good post! many on this site believe this was an overnight fix even though they all believed this was a tougher schedule! very few expected more then 7 wins and the majority assumed it would b3 a 6 win year with a bowl. i will always support the schoold and the program but the fan base needs some help
 

diefirma i couldnt have said it better. excellent post. i think that needs to be sent to maturi before he makes another mistake
 

I started watching Gopher football when I first came to town in 1968. I was dead broke but my mother-in-law was undergoing a career change and was a student at the U. so I would buy her tickets to attend the games in old Memorial Stadium. As my financial situation improved I upgraded my tickets and got out of the student section. Some years I should not have spent the money but I did anyway. I was a hard-core fan. Unfortunately for many years being a hard-core fan also meant being somewhat of a masochist. I have watched loss after loss. Some were heartbreakers, some were expected, none were easy. To make a long story short, Brewster will be my last coach. If Brewster cannot turn this program around I plan to move on.

For those of you who "don't want to settle for mediocrity" or think that Brewster is a "blowhard" and want to see Brewster fired I would say good luck. My father was a hard-core Iowa state fan and I have followed that program closely throughout the years. Since the mid-50s Iowa State has had 12 coaches and Minnesota has had 8 coaches. Of those 20 coaches only three had winning records; Warmath, Earle Bruce and Mason. That is a 15% success rate or a 10% success rate if you don't want to count Mason's creampuff schedule. Everybody thinks they're a coaching genius and know just whom to hire. Take the time to look at Dan Hawkins, Colorado's coach. In five years at Boise State coach Hawkins was 53-11 over all and 37-3 in conference games. How has he done at Colorado? I'll leave that as a homework exercise.

Has Brewster made mistakes? Of course! What did you expect? He had no head coaching experience. Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team. Moreover coach Brewster has shown the ability to recognize his mistakes and to correct them. The defensive coordinator left after the first year presumably with coach Brewster's encouragement. Dunbar and the line coach were fired when the offense proved unable to run the ball. Brewster has since hired two good defensive coaches - Roof and Cosgrove. All Brewster needs now is a good offensive coordinator and I assume if Fisch does not dramatically improve the offense next year he will be replaced as well. In the meantime the overall talent level will continue to improve. Will there be good years and bad years? Of course, to expect otherwise is naïve. Never-the-less the overall direction of the program is up. Brewster is clearly learning. He is a better head coach now than he was when he was hired. How good can he become? I don't know and I don't think anyone will know for at least a couple of years, maybe even 5 years. I would hope we would give him at least 5 more years but if we don't give him enough time to succeed and he is forced out then I'm out with him. I'm tired of watching the beatings and that 15% success rate doesn't bode well for a happy future.

a truly wonderful and thoughtful post.
 



Thank you for a great post. Yesterday I was listening to the Scott Van Pelt show on the radio. They were talking about bowl games that are under the radar but intriguing. MN vs. ISU was one of them. One of the reasons for this is because of Brew. SVP said how he felt that Brew was working very hard for Minnesota and is going to turn that thing around. He also said that he sat next to Brew on a plane and was very impressed with him.

I know SVP's opinion doesn't mean anything, but I would take a national sports guy's opinion thats unbiased over the clueless, pessimistic, fanatic, know-it-all bitchfest that happens around Minnesota from the media and ignorant fans.

Let's support OUR coach and GOLDEN GOPHERS!!!
 

My thoughts also

I started watching Gopher football when I first came to town in 1968. I was dead broke but my mother-in-law was undergoing a career change and was a student at the U. so I would buy her tickets to attend the games in old Memorial Stadium. As my financial situation improved I upgraded my tickets and got out of the student section. Some years I should not have spent the money but I did anyway. I was a hard-core fan. Unfortunately for many years being a hard-core fan also meant being somewhat of a masochist. I have watched loss after loss. Some were heartbreakers, some were expected, none were easy. To make a long story short, Brewster will be my last coach. If Brewster cannot turn this program around I plan to move on.

For those of you who "don't want to settle for mediocrity" or think that Brewster is a "blowhard" and want to see Brewster fired I would say good luck. My father was a hard-core Iowa state fan and I have followed that program closely throughout the years. Since the mid-50s Iowa State has had 12 coaches and Minnesota has had 8 coaches. Of those 20 coaches only three had winning records; Warmath, Earle Bruce and Mason. That is a 15% success rate or a 10% success rate if you don't want to count Mason's creampuff schedule. Everybody thinks they're a coaching genius and know just whom to hire. Take the time to look at Dan Hawkins, Colorado's coach. In five years at Boise State coach Hawkins was 53-11 over all and 37-3 in conference games. How has he done at Colorado? I'll leave that as a homework exercise.

Has Brewster made mistakes? Of course! What did you expect? He had no head coaching experience. Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team. Moreover coach Brewster has shown the ability to recognize his mistakes and to correct them. The defensive coordinator left after the first year presumably with coach Brewster's encouragement. Dunbar and the line coach were fired when the offense proved unable to run the ball. Brewster has since hired two good defensive coaches - Roof and Cosgrove. All Brewster needs now is a good offensive coordinator and I assume if Fisch does not dramatically improve the offense next year he will be replaced as well. In the meantime the overall talent level will continue to improve. Will there be good years and bad years? Of course, to expect otherwise is naïve. Never-the-less the overall direction of the program is up. Brewster is clearly learning. He is a better head coach now than he was when he was hired. How good can he become? I don't know and I don't think anyone will know for at least a couple of years, maybe even 5 years. I would hope we would give him at least 5 more years but if we don't give him enough time to succeed and he is forced out then I'm out with him. I'm tired of watching the beatings and that 15% success rate doesn't bode well for a happy future.

I have been around since the late thirtys but have the same thoughts you do.

At a Goal Line luncheon this Fall I was asked to tell my life as a Gopher football fan. I said that I started as a fan when the Gophers were at the top (3 National Titles in the 30's) but there has been many down years since. I then looked at Brewster and said " I don't have that many years left but would sure like to end this journey as a Gopher fan the same way I entered"

He answered me in his speech and said "Rog, this will happen and specifically mentioned the Rose Bowl"

I know he is sincere and I am ready to give him the chance.
 

I am only 35 years old and I became a big Fan during the Wacker years and in College during the mason years. I know there has been rough spots with Brewster but I honestly believe he is working tirelessly to bring this team to Championship caliber. I also believe he can do it, partly because of his optimism and won't take no for an answer attitude. And partly because of his close connection to Mack Brown, He knows what a great football program looks like and has people who will help get him there. I believe He deserves more time and can get it done if we all don't buy into the negativity in this town
 

Thank goodness for an actual realistic thread. Very good Opening Post and also follow up posts by true Gopher Fans.

Remember, folks:

Gopher Fans may come, Gopher Fans may go.
And Gopher Fans may peter out you know.

But I am a Gopher Fan thru thick or thin,
Peter out or Peter in.

Go Gophers!
 




Nice post, well said. I will always support the Gopher Football program in a positive light, I just wish others and the media would do their part. I dream of the day when I can travel to Pasadena to watch our Gophers in the Rose Bowl led by Brewster.
 


I started watching Gopher football when I first came to town in 1968. I was dead broke but my mother-in-law was undergoing a career change and was a student at the U. so I would buy her tickets to attend the games in old Memorial Stadium. As my financial situation improved I upgraded my tickets and got out of the student section. Some years I should not have spent the money but I did anyway. I was a hard-core fan. Unfortunately for many years being a hard-core fan also meant being somewhat of a masochist. I have watched loss after loss. Some were heartbreakers, some were expected, none were easy. To make a long story short, Brewster will be my last coach. If Brewster cannot turn this program around I plan to move on.

For those of you who "don't want to settle for mediocrity" or think that Brewster is a "blowhard" and want to see Brewster fired I would say good luck. My father was a hard-core Iowa state fan and I have followed that program closely throughout the years. Since the mid-50s Iowa State has had 12 coaches and Minnesota has had 8 coaches. Of those 20 coaches only three had winning records; Warmath, Earle Bruce and Mason. That is a 15% success rate or a 10% success rate if you don't want to count Mason's creampuff schedule. Everybody thinks they're a coaching genius and know just whom to hire. Take the time to look at Dan Hawkins, Colorado's coach. In five years at Boise State coach Hawkins was 53-11 over all and 37-3 in conference games. How has he done at Colorado? I'll leave that as a homework exercise.

Has Brewster made mistakes? Of course! What did you expect? He had no head coaching experience. Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team. Moreover coach Brewster has shown the ability to recognize his mistakes and to correct them. The defensive coordinator left after the first year presumably with coach Brewster's encouragement. Dunbar and the line coach were fired when the offense proved unable to run the ball. Brewster has since hired two good defensive coaches - Roof and Cosgrove. All Brewster needs now is a good offensive coordinator and I assume if Fisch does not dramatically improve the offense next year he will be replaced as well. In the meantime the overall talent level will continue to improve. Will there be good years and bad years? Of course, to expect otherwise is naïve. Never-the-less the overall direction of the program is up. Brewster is clearly learning. He is a better head coach now than he was when he was hired. How good can he become? I don't know and I don't think anyone will know for at least a couple of years, maybe even 5 years. I would hope we would give him at least 5 more years but if we don't give him enough time to succeed and he is forced out then I'm out with him. I'm tired of watching the beatings and that 15% success rate doesn't bode well for a happy future.

I have been around since the late thirtys but have the same thoughts you do.

At a Goal Line luncheon this Fall I was asked to tell my life as a Gopher football fan. I said that I started as a fan when the Gophers were at the top (3 National Titles in the 30's) but there has been many down years since. I then looked at Brewster and said " I don't have that many years left but would sure like to end this journey as a Gopher fan the same way I entered"

He answered me in his speech and said "Rog, this will happen and specifically mentioned the Rose Bowl"

I know he is sincere and I am ready to give him the chance.

Diefirma--great post. Roger--I was there and saw your comments and Brew's reply. Most "fans" don't get it. It took 40 years to screw up this program, it takes more than three to fix it. Brew has made some mis-steps, but the eye is on the prize. I will be luck enough to see these days, and so will my kids.

I believe you will, too.
 



I started watching Gopher football when I first came to town in 1968. I was dead broke but my mother-in-law was undergoing a career change and was a student at the U. so I would buy her tickets to attend the games in old Memorial Stadium. As my financial situation improved I upgraded my tickets and got out of the student section. Some years I should not have spent the money but I did anyway. I was a hard-core fan. Unfortunately for many years being a hard-core fan also meant being somewhat of a masochist. I have watched loss after loss. Some were heartbreakers, some were expected, none were easy. To make a long story short, Brewster will be my last coach. If Brewster cannot turn this program around I plan to move on.

For those of you who "don't want to settle for mediocrity" or think that Brewster is a "blowhard" and want to see Brewster fired I would say good luck. My father was a hard-core Iowa state fan and I have followed that program closely throughout the years. Since the mid-50s Iowa State has had 12 coaches and Minnesota has had 8 coaches. Of those 20 coaches only three had winning records; Warmath, Earle Bruce and Mason. That is a 15% success rate or a 10% success rate if you don't want to count Mason's creampuff schedule. Everybody thinks they're a coaching genius and know just whom to hire. Take the time to look at Dan Hawkins, Colorado's coach. In five years at Boise State coach Hawkins was 53-11 over all and 37-3 in conference games. How has he done at Colorado? I'll leave that as a homework exercise.

Has Brewster made mistakes? Of course! What did you expect? He had no head coaching experience. Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team. Moreover coach Brewster has shown the ability to recognize his mistakes and to correct them. The defensive coordinator left after the first year presumably with coach Brewster's encouragement. Dunbar and the line coach were fired when the offense proved unable to run the ball. Brewster has since hired two good defensive coaches - Roof and Cosgrove. All Brewster needs now is a good offensive coordinator and I assume if Fisch does not dramatically improve the offense next year he will be replaced as well. In the meantime the overall talent level will continue to improve. Will there be good years and bad years? Of course, to expect otherwise is naïve. Never-the-less the overall direction of the program is up. Brewster is clearly learning. He is a better head coach now than he was when he was hired. How good can he become? I don't know and I don't think anyone will know for at least a couple of years, maybe even 5 years. I would hope we would give him at least 5 more years but if we don't give him enough time to succeed and he is forced out then I'm out with him. I'm tired of watching the beatings and that 15% success rate doesn't bode well for a happy future.


Very thoughtful post. I have been following this program since the 70's when I was a kid. I am frustrated just as everyone else, and althoouth I have the temptation to support the firing of Brewster I do think he needs more time, maybe a couple of more years to see how his recruiting is going to work out. I was blasted in another post for saying that if Brew doesn't work out we are going to have to find a Tubby Smith like football coach to get out of the mediocrity. Whether the U can afford, has the prestige to bring someone in like that in or not I think that is what has to happen. It's hard for me to understand how he has stuck with Weber despite his inconsistent play. Was it that he felt that Grey was just not ready for that role yet? That is my biggest ?.
 

Perhaps not my "last" hope, but I'm getting up there too

I have told both of my children, who now both live in LA, that if the Gophers don't make it to another Rose Bowl in my lifetime, I want them or their children (none yet) to spread my ashes on the Rose Bowl field or get our players to put some on their shoulder pads. You know that I have said some stupid things on this board and I have said things that I regret saying, but there is one thing I will never regret and that is being a fan of Golden Gopher Football. I am addicted to it and the off season is one big case of the delerium tremens. The other night, I was dreaming of Gopher Football. It was some weird stuff - like Coach Brewster pulling up alongside me in a pickup truck as the game was starting. Next thing I know he's sleeping on my livingroom floor. And there was an image of the Gopher offensive line wearing skirts. Now you can put some Freudian spin on all this, but if I didn't spend time every day of my life thinking about Gopher Football and wanting my team to do well, well I guess I'd be dreaming about Tiger's wife. I love Gopher Football with all my heart, even if I want to bang my head against the goal post half the time.
 


Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team.


This is speculative at best and I am tired of hearing this bambied about as fact. All I know is that Minnesota Gophers 2004 would beat Minnesota Gophers 2009 42-14.
 

This is speculative at best and I am tired of hearing this bambied about as fact. All I know is that Minnesota Gophers 2004 would beat Minnesota Gophers 2009 42-14.

Now that would be an interesting matchup -- the Gophers 2004 defense vs. the Gophers 2009 offense.

My guess is if Decker played he would have about 200 yards receiving!! I don't think the present defense would have been able to stop Barber and Maroney. I would take the 2004 team to win by 2 TD's, especially if Decker wouldn't be playing because I don't know if the 2009 offense could move the ball on them at all.
 

This is speculative at best and I am tired of hearing this bambied about as fact. All I know is that Minnesota Gophers 2004 would beat Minnesota Gophers 2009 42-14.

How do you figure? Check out overall rivals position rankings and ask any national sports expert or college coach or NFL scout and they would all say Brewster has more talent here than has ever been here or at least in decades.
 

How do you figure? Check out overall rivals position rankings and ask any national sports expert or college coach or NFL scout and they would all say Brewster has more talent here than has ever been here or at least in decades.


If that were the case then it would be evident on the field. Can you honestly say with a straight face that the 2009 Gophers could beat the 2004 Gophers? If so, then you either a) have no sense of history; b) are a moron; or c) both.
 

Huh???

As I've said before the rampent homerism here astounds me. This season was at best a move sideways. Does Brewster deserve one more season to show that he understands 1st and goal from the 2 yard line? Yes...does he deserve one more year to show that maybe he learned something from John Clay off tackle for 8yds 5 plays in a row? Yes...unfortunately I am not at all convinced based on what I saw that we will see any meaningful improvement next year. I certainly hope that I am wrong; but a reasoned analysis does not directly point to substantial improvement next year. Rivals shmivals...people use our rivals ranking as if it certifies success next season...recruiting is nice, but damnit I want a coach who can turn a lump into diamond...Brew better get his buffer out because most of the impact players from this season are old regime...He is a COACH and he needs to recruit; he's not a recruiter that needs to coach. We've seen the recruiting side and it is better then we've seen in the past. Now we need to see the recruits turn into impact players.
 

He is a recruiter that needs to coach. The recruiting is more important because we are so talent deprived.
 

charles if you dont think there is more talent on this team you're either a) an idiot b) blind or c) both
 

He is a recruiter that needs to coach. The recruiting is more important because we are so talent deprived.

Odd...most of the impact players from this season are old regime recruits...yet the homers claim we were improved...If your statment were accurate more of his recruits would be starters...Also, Gray, a Brewster recruit isn't even talented/smart enough to play let alone start. Thanks for helping me prove my point.:clap:
 

I started watching Gopher football when I first came to town in 1968. I was dead broke but my mother-in-law was undergoing a career change and was a student at the U. so I would buy her tickets to attend the games in old Memorial Stadium. As my financial situation improved I upgraded my tickets and got out of the student section. Some years I should not have spent the money but I did anyway. I was a hard-core fan. Unfortunately for many years being a hard-core fan also meant being somewhat of a masochist. I have watched loss after loss. Some were heartbreakers, some were expected, none were easy. To make a long story short, Brewster will be my last coach. If Brewster cannot turn this program around I plan to move on.

For those of you who "don't want to settle for mediocrity" or think that Brewster is a "blowhard" and want to see Brewster fired I would say good luck. My father was a hard-core Iowa state fan and I have followed that program closely throughout the years. Since the mid-50s Iowa State has had 12 coaches and Minnesota has had 8 coaches. Of those 20 coaches only three had winning records; Warmath, Earle Bruce and Mason. That is a 15% success rate or a 10% success rate if you don't want to count Mason's creampuff schedule. Everybody thinks they're a coaching genius and know just whom to hire. Take the time to look at Dan Hawkins, Colorado's coach. In five years at Boise State coach Hawkins was 53-11 over all and 37-3 in conference games. How has he done at Colorado? I'll leave that as a homework exercise.

Has Brewster made mistakes? Of course! What did you expect? He had no head coaching experience. Tim Brewster has, however, dramatically upgraded the talent on this team. Moreover coach Brewster has shown the ability to recognize his mistakes and to correct them. The defensive coordinator left after the first year presumably with coach Brewster's encouragement. Dunbar and the line coach were fired when the offense proved unable to run the ball. Brewster has since hired two good defensive coaches - Roof and Cosgrove. All Brewster needs now is a good offensive coordinator and I assume if Fisch does not dramatically improve the offense next year he will be replaced as well. In the meantime the overall talent level will continue to improve. Will there be good years and bad years? Of course, to expect otherwise is naïve. Never-the-less the overall direction of the program is up. Brewster is clearly learning. He is a better head coach now than he was when he was hired. How good can he become? I don't know and I don't think anyone will know for at least a couple of years, maybe even 5 years. I would hope we would give him at least 5 more years but if we don't give him enough time to succeed and he is forced out then I'm out with him. I'm tired of watching the beatings and that 15% success rate doesn't bode well for a happy future.



I would agree!! I would take the Gophers winning the Rose Bowl over the Vikings winning the Super Bowl!!! That is how strongly I FEEL about Gopher Football!!!
 

Odd...most of the impact players from this season are old regime recruits...yet the homers claim we were improved...If your statment were accurate more of his recruits would be starters...Also, Gray, a Brewster recruit isn't even talented/smart enough to play let alone start. Thanks for helping me prove my point.:clap:

I am so glad you could figure out a playbook and I am not talking about your junior high playbook either!! I am sure you are "smart enough" after all you are hiding behind your computer!!
 

charles if you dont think there is more talent on this team you're either a) an idiot b) blind or c) both


Marion Barber III
Tyrone Carter
Greg Eslinger
Ben Hamilton
Michael Lehan
Rhys Lloyd
Laurence Maroney
Anthony Montgomery
Logan Payne
Darrell Reid
Gary Russell
Mark Setterstrom
Matt Spaeth,
Thomas Tapeh
Ben Utecht,
Dom Barber,
Ernie Wheelwright


You are the moron. The group on this team may have one or two pros at tops.
 

The argument that if the freshman and sophomores were better they would be starting is so absurd. They are freshman and sophomores and they are getting stronger and more experienced through practice. It does not meant that the person in front of them in the depth chart is more talented. So you can clap for yourself all you want but you still are a dip*&^!#*&^!#*&^!#*&^!# who does not know about football. Your comment about Gray is also so completely off based, the experts say he is is as good as Pryor and a better passer. He was a freshman for gosh sake.
 

charles if you dont think there is more talent on this team you're either a) an idiot b) blind or c) both

That's debatable. I dare say if we were playing the 2006 Gophers in the Insight Bowl, the 2009 version would not be favored.
 

The argument that if the freshman and sophomores were better they would be starting is so absurd. They are freshman and sophomores and they are getting stronger and more experienced through practice. It does not meant that the person in front of them in the depth chart is more talented. So you can clap for yourself all you want but you still are a dip*&^!#*&^!#*&^!#*&^!# who does not know about football. Your comment about Gray is also so completely off based, the experts say he is is as good as Pryor and a better passer. He was a freshman for gosh sake.

Bankonit...I suppose the $^@(#&# is replacing profanity...cute. Now, as for your knowledge of football...well, I will place you in a box.

Pryor, too easy, but you brought it up. Let's see his freshmen year on a better team and he actually had a meaningful impact. If the experts, as you claim, think that Gray is better then once again you support, thru your raging IQ, my earlier point about us needing a Coach who can develop talent.

Now as for your idiotic point that keeping freshman and sophmores on the sidelines does not mean that the guys playing are more talented. Well I sure as hell hope that we are fielding the best team every game...what your saying is that Brewster and all the coaches who get it are keeping younger better players on the sidelines for what purpose? All the real good programs only let the real talent practice...

Geez...who wipes the drool off of your chin?
 




Top Bottom