mplsbadger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 2,267
- Reaction score
- 43
- Points
- 48
Bob_Loblaw said:It's not ironic at all because the two stories don't contradict. If you were to sell your house and you hired an agent on a deal that he would get paid a percentage of what you made on the sell, and you went behind his back after he put some work in, he would have a claim in equity against you.
So you're conceding that you owe the agent something and this is an argument about the actual timing of the cash flows?