6 Nov 1999
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 1,574
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
1. Will we hear the Minnesota Rouser in its full glory after scoring points on the Big Ten Network (BTN) today? The Rouser is our trademark and signature. During the last two home games broadcast, that being the Iowa game of 2010 (I think it was ESPN or ESPN2 over my Verizon FIOS feed) and New Mexico State (Big Ten Network (BTN) over my Verizon FIOS feed), I have not heard the Rouser once in anything close to its full glory. Every rendition of it seemed like it was clipped above the 1,000 Hz frequency. Only the tuba section could be heard watching the Iowa game. Last week I just could not hear it at all. This never seems to be a problem for “The Victors,” “On Wisconsin,” “Buckeye Battle Cry,” “Across The Field,” “The MSU Fight Song,” “Hail Purdue,” or even “Go U Northwestern” when their home games are broadcast. This seems to me to be a disease which only manifests on University of Minnesota home game broadcasts.
2. My feed of the NMSU game over BTN / Verizon FIOS on the standard (not High Definition (HD)) channel delivered a screen truncated on the top and truncated on the bottom. On one TV it was really bad, like a 30 – 35 percent loss of the screen real estate, with the top and bottom portion black. On an older TV which is not as wide, it was about a 20 – 25 percent loss of screen real estate. At first I thought something is wrong with my feed, but then I noticed that some commercials were not affected by this disease. BTN / Verizon apparently decided to deliver these commercials with no loss of screen real estate.
3. Are any other BTN viewers experiencing this same clipping / truncation of the top and bottom of their standard (non-HD) feeds? If so, what cable / satellite / data communications provider are you subscribed to? I am trying to discern if this is a BTN wide disease or just a Verizon FIOS disease.
4. I suspect this may be a gambit by BTN and / or Verizon to get customers to pony up and pay extra for BTN HD feeds which are probably full screen and not truncated on the top and bottom.
a. I don’t have money to subscribe to BTN-HD.
b. It goes against the principle that the Big Ten Network was originally founded on, that being, the cable companies / internet service providers (ISPs) were to deliver the Big Ten Network content at no additional charge. Is BTN now reneging on that principle?
c. I don’t buy any assertion that the clipped real estate is somehow a technological problem. The major networks have no problem delivering a full screen in both standard and HD modes. This seems to be a disease that the BTN / Verizon created to spur additional HD subscriptions.
5. Thoughts?
2. My feed of the NMSU game over BTN / Verizon FIOS on the standard (not High Definition (HD)) channel delivered a screen truncated on the top and truncated on the bottom. On one TV it was really bad, like a 30 – 35 percent loss of the screen real estate, with the top and bottom portion black. On an older TV which is not as wide, it was about a 20 – 25 percent loss of screen real estate. At first I thought something is wrong with my feed, but then I noticed that some commercials were not affected by this disease. BTN / Verizon apparently decided to deliver these commercials with no loss of screen real estate.
3. Are any other BTN viewers experiencing this same clipping / truncation of the top and bottom of their standard (non-HD) feeds? If so, what cable / satellite / data communications provider are you subscribed to? I am trying to discern if this is a BTN wide disease or just a Verizon FIOS disease.
4. I suspect this may be a gambit by BTN and / or Verizon to get customers to pony up and pay extra for BTN HD feeds which are probably full screen and not truncated on the top and bottom.
a. I don’t have money to subscribe to BTN-HD.
b. It goes against the principle that the Big Ten Network was originally founded on, that being, the cable companies / internet service providers (ISPs) were to deliver the Big Ten Network content at no additional charge. Is BTN now reneging on that principle?
c. I don’t buy any assertion that the clipped real estate is somehow a technological problem. The major networks have no problem delivering a full screen in both standard and HD modes. This seems to be a disease that the BTN / Verizon created to spur additional HD subscriptions.
5. Thoughts?