Big Ten details 24-team CFP plan with no league title games

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
64,141
Reaction score
23,069
Points
113
Per ESPN:

The Big Ten is circulating an internal document that lays out what a 24-team College Football Playoff would look like, including the elimination of conference championship games, a 23+1 selection model and an additional weekend of on-campus CFP home games.

With the College Football Playoff format remaining at 12 for the 2026 season, the drumbeat of potential CFP change will inevitably echo through the coming season. The document, obtained by ESPN, includes other interesting details, such as the committee being tasked with not having any rematches in the first round.

The sides of the potential expansion issue were drawn clear in recent weeks. The SEC was willing to go to a 16-team format, and the Big Ten was willing to grow to 16 only with an agreement to eventually go to 24 teams. Those two leagues essentially control the CFP decision-making, hence the stalemate.

The Big Ten internal document details what the conference has termed a "24 team CFP Format Compromise." Sources told ESPN it has been distributed to the league's athletic directors and a working group of head coaches.

While the document presents nothing formal or official in terms of the future of the College Football Playoff, it does begin to unpack the vision of the 24-team format.

The idea has increased in conversation among coaches and athletic directors in the Power 4 leagues, as the coaches acknowledge a playoff-or-bust pressure and athletic directors want more postseason opportunities to justify rapidly increasing roster expenses.

The internal document begins by offering a potential timeline desired by the Big Ten, which wants the format to grow to a 16-team playoff for 2027 and 2028. The document indicates a move to 24 for "no later than the 2029 season," which would then run through the end of the current CFP contract, which goes through 2031. From there, there would be a new television contract and further flexibility to change.

In the proposed 16-team format, there would be five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams, an idea that has been widely discussed. The top two teams would get byes, and the opening games -- No. 16 vs. No. 13 and No. 14 vs. No. 15 -- would be played on the second weekend in December, likely slotting around the annual Army vs. Navy game.

There would be six second-round games on campus and four quarterfinals at traditional bowl locations on New Year's Eve and New Year's Day. That would be followed by semifinal games at bowl sites and the national title game, which would be played around mid-January.

The 24-team format would consist of the 23 best teams and one spot for the Group of 6. There would be no automatic qualifiers, which had been a point of emphasis for the Big Ten in CFP discussions last year. If the field grows to 24, sources have indicated that automatic qualifiers would matter less to the Big Ten.


Go Gophers!!
 

Per ESPN:

The Big Ten is circulating an internal document that lays out what a 24-team College Football Playoff would look like, including the elimination of conference championship games, a 23+1 selection model and an additional weekend of on-campus CFP home games.

With the College Football Playoff format remaining at 12 for the 2026 season, the drumbeat of potential CFP change will inevitably echo through the coming season. The document, obtained by ESPN, includes other interesting details, such as the committee being tasked with not having any rematches in the first round.

The sides of the potential expansion issue were drawn clear in recent weeks. The SEC was willing to go to a 16-team format, and the Big Ten was willing to grow to 16 only with an agreement to eventually go to 24 teams. Those two leagues essentially control the CFP decision-making, hence the stalemate.

The Big Ten internal document details what the conference has termed a "24 team CFP Format Compromise." Sources told ESPN it has been distributed to the league's athletic directors and a working group of head coaches.

While the document presents nothing formal or official in terms of the future of the College Football Playoff, it does begin to unpack the vision of the 24-team format.

The idea has increased in conversation among coaches and athletic directors in the Power 4 leagues, as the coaches acknowledge a playoff-or-bust pressure and athletic directors want more postseason opportunities to justify rapidly increasing roster expenses.

The internal document begins by offering a potential timeline desired by the Big Ten, which wants the format to grow to a 16-team playoff for 2027 and 2028. The document indicates a move to 24 for "no later than the 2029 season," which would then run through the end of the current CFP contract, which goes through 2031. From there, there would be a new television contract and further flexibility to change.

In the proposed 16-team format, there would be five automatic qualifiers and 11 at-large teams, an idea that has been widely discussed. The top two teams would get byes, and the opening games -- No. 16 vs. No. 13 and No. 14 vs. No. 15 -- would be played on the second weekend in December, likely slotting around the annual Army vs. Navy game.

There would be six second-round games on campus and four quarterfinals at traditional bowl locations on New Year's Eve and New Year's Day. That would be followed by semifinal games at bowl sites and the national title game, which would be played around mid-January.

The 24-team format would consist of the 23 best teams and one spot for the Group of 6. There would be no automatic qualifiers, which had been a point of emphasis for the Big Ten in CFP discussions last year. If the field grows to 24, sources have indicated that automatic qualifiers would matter less to the Big Ten.


Go Gophers!!
Again, go to 16, no byes, first two rounds at home for higher ranked teams. Basically 25% of power conference teams make the playoffs.
 

Again, go to 16, no byes, first two rounds at home for higher ranked teams. Basically 25% of power conference teams make the playoffs.

From the plan it seems clear they still want to involve the Bowls at the Quarterfinal level, which puts the kabosh on first 2 rounds at home.

Just personal opinion, I think they need them to make the finances work in addition to a lack of a desire to host as many as 2 games on campus in December.

Also not enough open TV windows for exclusive games to have 8 1st Round games over 1 weekend.

For a 16 team format, I actually like the idea of Teams 3-12 get a Bye and Teams 1 & 2 a double bye.
 

From the plan it seems clear they still want to involve the Bowls at the Quarterfinal level, which puts the kabosh on first 2 rounds at home.

Just personal opinion, I think they need them to make the finances work in addition to a lack of a desire to host as many as 2 games on campus in December.

Also not enough open TV windows for exclusive games to have 8 1st Round games over 1 weekend.

For a 16 team format, I actually like the idea of Teams 3-12 get a Bye and Teams 1 & 2 a double bye.
Says right in the OP there would be second round games in campus. I'm definitely not a fan of going to 24.
 

Says right in the OP there would be second round games in campus. I'm definitely not a fan of going to 24.
For the proposed 16 Team Format:

1st Round would be Seeds 13-16 (Seeds 13 & 14 hosting).
2nd Round would be Seeds 3-12 + Round 1 Winners (Seeds 3-8 hosting)

No chance to Host 2 games.

Seeds 1 & 2 Bye into Quarters at Bowls.
 


For the proposed 16 Team Format:

1st Round would be Seeds 13-16 (Seeds 13 & 14 hosting).
2nd Round would be Seeds 3-12 + Round 1 Winners (Seeds 3-8 hosting)

No chance to Host 2 games.

Seeds 1 & 2 Bye into Quarters at Bowls.
So second round on campus. Terrible plan to have byes in a 16 team bracket.
 

Why does the big ten want 24?

Let’s start there.

Once that’s clear encourage/let/force Pettiti to spend more time with family.
 

24 is the way and the life for college football. More chances for more teams to get in. I like auto bids, but I don't think that will happen. I'm more concerned about who get to pick the teams that get in.

I don't want to see #1 vs the G6 rep in a 16-team tournament, but I also don't like teams sitting for weeks and playing teams that are in rhythm.

I'd also like to see regional bids for quarterfinals that bid along with the bowls for those games.
 

So second round on campus. Terrible plan to have byes in a 16 team bracket.

All teams Hosting a 2nd Round game would have had a Bye in the 1st Round, thus my statement of "NO Teams Hosting TWO Games on campus" is VALID.

Maximum of 1 Home Game.

In a 16 team field rewarding the Top 2 Teams with a BYE I think is fantastic. Potentially brilliant.

- It avoids the potential for mismatches in Round 1 for #1 vs #16 & #2 vs #15 which also would have low value for TV-Streaming broadcast partners.

- 2 games Weekend #1 and 6 on Weekend #2 would still allow each game to have its own broadcast window (or minimal overlap).

I love this plan. Far from terrible.
 
Last edited:



All teams Hosting a 2nd Round game would have had a Bye in the 1st Round, thus my statement of "NO Teams Hosting TWO Games on campus" is VALID.

Maximum of 1 Home Game.

In a 16 team field rewarding the Top 2 Teams with a BYE I think is fantastic. Potentially brilliant.

- It avoids the potential for mismatches in Round 1 for #1 vs #16 & #2 vs #15 which also would have low value for TV-Streaming broadcast partners.

- 2 games Weekend #1 and 6 on Weekend #2 would still allow each game to have its own broadcast window (or minimal overlap).

I love this plan. Far from terrible.
Your response was to me saying the first two rounds on campus. You do agree the first two rounds would on campus, right?

Completely disagree on the mismatches, that is what makes it fun as the tournement continues. Again, hate the byes.
 

The 24 team thing is probably inevitable. I don't hate it. Conference Championship Games are lame now and a team like Minnesota will actually have a shot with 24.
 

Again, go to 16, no byes, first two rounds at home for higher ranked teams. Basically 25% of power conference teams make the playoffs.
It seems the holdup with this is that the big ten believes conference championships should go away and just 2 more playoff games wouldn’t increase revenue enough to make up for the lost Conference title game

Based on analysis I’ve read
 

The 24 team thing is probably inevitable. I don't hate it. Conference Championship Games are lame now and a team like Minnesota will actually have a shot with 24.
The thing I like about 24 is it increases the chance of a conference title a great deal….
By bringing back co titles
 



24 is the way and the life for college football. More chances for more teams to get in. I like auto bids, but I don't think that will happen. I'm more concerned about who get to pick the teams that get in.

I don't want to see #1 vs the G6 rep in a 16-team tournament, but I also don't like teams sitting for weeks and playing teams that are in rhythm.

I'd also like to see regional bids for quarterfinals that bid along with the bowls for those games.
If it’s 24 I’m okay with no auto bids until I see it fail.
An 11-1 team is going to make a 24 team tourney 98% of the time

I wanted 11 auto bids but the auto bid went away if you weren’t in the top 25

This is essentially that, but 24 instead of 25
 

Your response was to me saying the first two rounds on campus. You do agree the first two rounds would on campus, right?
Agree and I never stated otherwise (nor intended to infer such a statement).

My comment below (post #3) was referring Teams/Schools being adverse to hosting as many as 2 playoff games on campus. They get around that with the Byes to the first 2 Seeds and First Round being Seeds 13-16.

Apologies if that was not clear originally.

It made no mention of the CFP First 2 rounds (of what would become 5) on campus sites.

Just personal opinion, I think they need them to make the finances work in addition to a lack of a desire to host as many as 2 games on campus in December.
 


It seems the holdup with this is that the big ten believes conference championships should go away and just 2 more playoff games wouldn’t increase revenue enough to make up for the lost Conference title game

Based on analysis I’ve read
Interesting on the conference championship games. Same number of rounds at 16 so wouldn't need to make any schedule changes.
 

Agree and I never stated otherwise (nor intended to infer such a statement).

My comment below (post #3) was referring Teams/Schools being adverse to hosting as many as 2 playoff games on campus. They get around that with the Byes to the first 2 Seeds and First Round being Seeds 13-16.

Apologies if that was not clear originally.

It made no mention of the CFP First 2 rounds (of what would become 5) on campus sites.
Thanks.
 

Interesting on the conference championship games. Same number of rounds at 16 so wouldn't need to make any schedule changes.
I don’t have the link but the story I read this morning essentially had a big ten person saying that a conference title game puts risks on your best team with little to no benefit.

But if you cut 4 power 4 title games and replace them with just 2 or 4 more playoff games it doesn’t pay for itself
 

I don’t have the link but the story I read this morning essentially had a big ten person saying that a conference title game puts risks on your best team with little to no benefit.

But if you cut 4 power 4 title games and replace them with just 2 or 4 more playoff games it doesn’t pay for itself
With 16 you can keep them.
 




Top Bottom