BIG Game 15: Gophers @ Badgers, Feb 15th!

A couple notes from the telecast and former Gopher assistant Shimmy Miller. Kudos to her for admitting that Whalen and staff hadn't offered McKinney. She acknowledged that was a miss on their part. She also noted that she'd worked with Hart during Sofie's redshirt year and she'd found Hart to be an extremely hard worker, someone who really wanted to improve her game. It's nice to see that all of Sofie's work is paying off.
over Soph's last 3 games

14.7ppg
7 rpg
2.3 apg

Sophie has been FANTASTIC as of late.. her rebounding as really been good this season. She has had 19 games of 5 or more rebounds. She had 16 games all of last year.
 

GG is getting frequent touches on offense. However, she sees the floor really well and recognizes when somebody has a better shot than her. Either due to the additional coverage she is drawing, or somebody making a good cut, she chooses not to shoot and is instead making good passes. I love that she wants to win more than she wants personal stats, even though it does hurt my fantasy stats for her….. 😍
 

I hope Coach P has the ladies dialed in right off the jump, as the Lady Buckeyes are going to be coming into Williams in a bad mood. I think they'll want to get that bad 19-point comeback loss to the Terps at home in their rearview. So, I expect them to come out hard and try to make a point.
 

Another well executed defensive game plan. Cleaned up the turnovers and suddenly the offense looks good again. It's funny that when the offense was suffering from execution and poor shooting issues from everybody but Tori and GG, it was a crap offense. Now, that players are executing it better and Braun, Hart and Battle are finishing more efficiently, the offense is fine. If you've been paying attention, Coach P hasn't really changed anything, the players are just doing it better..

A note to the person complaining about not running plays for GG. Other than out of bounds plays, how many set plays for specific players to you believe they actually run during the course of a game?

I'll give you a hint. Very few. This is a motion offense that is designed to make sure you get a post touch, from which we can either shoot or pass back out to a shooter. The other thing about many motion with post option offenses is that they are often penetrate and dish oriented as well. The idea being that if I can't pass to the post, maybe you can penetrate and if you're cut off, dish to the post or back out. GG has recently found her offense by penetrating or by cutting to the lane and getting a pass. Read and React. And of course, if the penetration is being cut off, move the ball from side to side, in and out, draw the defense to an area and look for a cutter away from the action. Very few specific play calls for a specific player in a motion offense. More like specific actions to open an area of the court for whichever player ends up there after all the passes, screens and rotations. It's why you recruit to get players who can do a lot of different things, so that it doesn't matter who starts the action and who ends up finishing the action, as long as it's an open look. It's a read and react offense. The beauty of it is, if a defense is designed to stop your best shooter, know and practiced against most of those plays, and if you can't get that shooter open and are now kinda screwed, well, just keep moving the ball around ideally, one of your other shooters comes open in the same spot.. If you've noticed, teams have made a concentrated effort to run out on GG if she's on the perimeter. With a motion offense, just keep running, penetrating, cutting, passing and one of our other shooters will end up open or in a position to create something for themselves.

When people complain about not running enough plays for a specific player, it just shows that they aren't aware of what the Gophers offensive strategy and philosophy is. Although I'm not smart enough to actually design a motion offense with different actions depending on what you see, I've watched enough college practices and talked to enough coaches to get an idea of what many of them are trying to do and why.
Thanks for your detailed post. As I read your post and recalled the last several games, I see this is what the team is doing.
 

Another well executed defensive game plan. Cleaned up the turnovers and suddenly the offense looks good again. It's funny that when the offense was suffering from execution and poor shooting issues from everybody but Tori and GG, it was a crap offense. Now, that players are executing it better and Braun, Hart and Battle are finishing more efficiently, the offense is fine. If you've been paying attention, Coach P hasn't really changed anything, the players are just doing it better..

A note to the person complaining about not running plays for GG. Other than out of bounds plays, how many set plays for specific players to you believe they actually run during the course of a game?

I'll give you a hint. Very few. This is a motion offense that is designed to make sure you get a post touch, from which we can either shoot or pass back out to a shooter. The other thing about many motion with post option offenses is that they are often penetrate and dish oriented as well. The idea being that if I can't pass to the post, maybe you can penetrate and if you're cut off, dish to the post or back out. GG has recently found her offense by penetrating or by cutting to the lane and getting a pass. Read and React. And of course, if the penetration is being cut off, move the ball from side to side, in and out, draw the defense to an area and look for a cutter away from the action. Very few specific play calls for a specific player in a motion offense. More like specific actions to open an area of the court for whichever player ends up there after all the passes, screens and rotations. It's why you recruit to get players who can do a lot of different things, so that it doesn't matter who starts the action and who ends up finishing the action, as long as it's an open look. It's a read and react offense. The beauty of it is, if a defense is designed to stop your best shooter, know and practiced against most of those plays, and if you can't get that shooter open and are now kinda screwed, well, just keep moving the ball around ideally, one of your other shooters comes open in the same spot.. If you've noticed, teams have made a concentrated effort to run out on GG if she's on the perimeter. With a motion offense, just keep running, penetrating, cutting, passing and one of our other shooters will end up open or in a position to create something for themselves.

When people complain about not running enough plays for a specific player, it just shows that they aren't aware of what the Gophers offensive strategy and philosophy is. Although I'm not smart enough to actually design a motion offense with different actions depending on what you see, I've watched enough college practices and talked to enough coaches to get an idea of what many of them are trying to do and why.
I know technically we’ve been trying to run this same motion offense for the entire time that Dawn has been here, we just haven’t been running it as it is supposed to be run for long stretches until maybe halfway through this season.

A few reasons why we’ve seen such improvement: 1) Our posts have been doing a better job passing out of double teams to open shooters or to other players who can swing the ball for open shots. Hart is actually a very good passer as is Tonga. They also are finding cutters to the basket for layups out of double teams, which is demoralizing to the defense.

2) Our guards and Battle in particular have improved in their ability to recognize when they are being cut off and rather than forcing a shot are finding the open player at the arc;

3) Braun being healthy and starting to play the way she is capable gives us one more threat to drive and pass or to be the player open for a three-point shot.
 





Top Bottom