Roland Brooks
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2010
- Messages
- 3,077
- Reaction score
- 2,188
- Points
- 113
Exactly…. People are right on topic. Comical..
This is the part I was replying to. Didn’t say you weren’t on topic, just that the focus is on the GophersI thought competition breeds greatness. We should want to spotlight UST and get more quality basketball players in the state. UST should be more worried about the U poaching their best players, but somehow the U is the one who doesn't have anything to gain? We played Concordia St. Paul this season in exhibition, was that a bad idea? For those of you that say go buy a ticket to a UST game, you must have much more time on your hands than most. I have time to follow the Gophers and that's about all I care to focus my energy towards sports. UST has local players on their team that would be fun to watch against the Gophers, I thought this board was all about local, local, local!!!!
A lot of us that went to St. Thomas would probably show up at Williams Arena or even at the Xcel Energy Center if UST could schedule a name team, just for the novelty factor. Most of us would not bother to watch a Summit game in the on campus gym though.And UST has almost a thousand empty seats in an arena that doesn't even seat 2000. Any notion that a game against them would help ticket sales is misguided. The only reason to play them is to throw them a bone. And last time I checked, that's not our responsibility.
Many folks will not get or understand Ben and Coyle’s decision no matter how well you explain it.100% agree. I’d play the first couple in a neutral site game at Sanford/Fiserv or something like that, but not here
I think I probably have a little bias from my MIAC playing days (different sport) when UST was an opponent, and I think you probably have a little bias as well being an alum. Agree to disagree on my end
What? The U should not give them any help now to assist them in building up into the big east. nip it in the bud and keep them at their place in the pecking order.Well actually the opposite. You were weren’t playing them because you don’t want to help them along their goals….they actually present a lot bigger threat to the U of M basketball program far away from now than now. Right now, they are no threat. If they were in the big east the U of M should do everything they can to not give them any help
BS, no you wouldn't. So how many Winona State or Concordia games at the U have you bought tickets for?Well, yeah that's the whole point. Because I am not a season ticket holder, I would be more likely to a purchase a ticket (or buy a mini package) vs St Thomas instead of Alcorn St, Jacksonville, Ft Wayne, UM-KC et al.
Comparing an exhibition game to a regular season game isn’t a really good comparisonBS, no you wouldn't. So how many Winona State or Concordia games at the U have you bought tickets for?
If UST can make the big east some day. Their relationship with the U of M will have 0% to do with it either wayWhat? The U should not give them any help now to assist them in building up into the big east. nip it in the bud and keep them at their place in the pecking order.
So what is it with UST that you assume attracts all of the intense fans interest?I don't believe anyone really feels the same about UST as they do Corpus Christi. It's just not possible. I could understand (but I'd disagree) with someone saying that they'd have more interest in UST but they would be worried that interest would breath life into UST and create competition. But to say they have just as little interest in UST as they would Corpus Christi. . .that's bizarre.
quit being such an jerk.... You know exactly what he meant. To him and others, playing UST is not a more attractive opponent than playing another small school such as CC. People were saying it was obviously a more attractive opponent and it would sell many more tickets, bizzle just said he didn't think there was a difference. His not wanting to help UST by playing them was not a factor in the original question. You can circle around with all of the semantics that you want, but you knew exactly what he was saying.No you said they are the same in your level of interest. Which is not true. You actively think they should avoid scheduling UST. You have a completely different level of interest in UST compared to other cupcakes. There probably isn’t another non power 6 team in the country you think the gophers should avoid
You said Corpus Christi is no different than UST to you.
No he said he had no interest difference. He clearly does have a large difference in his opinion of the two schools if he actively doesn’t want the U of schedule one of them. That isn’t semantics. It’s reality. Sorry if you don’t like that.quit being such an jerk.... You know exactly what he meant. To him and others, playing UST is not a more attractive opponent than playing another small school such as CC. People were saying it was obviously a more attractive opponent and it would sell many more tickets, bizzle just said he didn't think there was a difference. His not wanting to help UST by playing them was not a factor in the original question. You can circle around with all of the semantics that you want, but you knew exactly what he was saying.
The whole point is there is currently NO competition between the U and UST! The U is quantum levels above UST in the pecking order. UST would love to be considered in the same breath as the U and needs all of the help it can get to accomplish that. The U is not afraid of UST and has no interest in helping breed them into a competitive team.I thought competition breeds greatness. We should want to spotlight UST and get more quality basketball players in the state. UST should be more worried about the U poaching their best players, but somehow the U is the one who doesn't have anything to gain? We played Concordia St. Paul this season in exhibition, was that a bad idea? For those of you that say go buy a ticket to a UST game, you must have much more time on your hands than most. I have time to follow the Gophers and that's about all I care to focus my energy towards sports. UST has local players on their team that would be fun to watch against the Gophers, I thought this board was all about local, local, local!!!!
Yeah. I agree with that. If the U of M thinks UST could be in the big east in 20 years…they should NOT schedule them.The whole point is there is currently NO competition between the U and UST! The U is quantum levels above UST in the pecking order. UST would love to be considered in the same breath as the U and needs all of the help it can get to accomplish that. The U is not afraid of UST and has no interest in helping breed them into a competitive team.
It is a local team playing with local players and they keep time and track of the score.Comparing an exhibition game to a regular season game isn’t a really good comparison
Yes, but the original premise was that UST would be a much more attractive game and he said it would be the same as CC. (he did say no difference, but that was in reference to attractiveness, not unattractiveness).No he said he had no interest difference. He clearly does have a large difference in his opinion of the two schools if he actively doesn’t want the U of schedule one of them. That isn’t semantics. It’s reality. Sorry if you don’t like that.
For instance, I don’t want the gopher football team to schedule NDSU because I think it is bad for the program. I would rather the team schedule someone like Indiana state or Villanova. So I feel differently about NDSU than I do about other FCS programs.
No difference in attractiveness literally isn’t true though. He finds st Thomas less attractiveYes, but the original premise was that UST would be a much more attractive game and he said it would be the same as CC. (he did say no difference, but that was in reference to attractiveness, not unattractiveness).
I've bought Gopher tix to both of those schools, UMD & Southwest St too, even though they were exhibitions.BS, no you wouldn't. So how many Winona State or Concordia games at the U have you bought tickets for?
It doesn't really matter where we think they will be... UST's goal is to be in the big east so we should treat them as such.Yeah. I agree with that. If the U of M thinks UST could be in the big east in 20 years…they should NOT schedule them.
I personally don’t think UST will ever be higher than maybe the Missouri valley or Atlantic 10…so I don’t think the U of M hurts themselves at all by scheduling the game.
I’m connected at UST and I am going to disagree with the premise that their goal is the big eastIt doesn't really matter where we think they will be... UST's goal is to be in the big east so we should treat them as such.
There is a big difference in the Exhibition games. It doesn't count towards RPI, Net or NCAA Tournament eligibility. Usually the Gophers just want to work out kinks with the starters, give the bench some run, break a sweat and not get hurt. It's noticably a glorified scrimmage. That Winona St game was an exception, they were good, felt like a "real" game.It is a local team playing with local players and they keep time and track of the score.
I am just pointing out that you currently have an opportunity to see local schools with local talent play the U. So if that hasn't caused you to buy tickets then it is not credible to say it will for UST.
I can't speak for the others but your gut narrative of advocates secretly hoping UST pulls off the upset is a huge reach. If the Gophers played them I would want to pound them way beyond double digits. Also, I have never said squat with regards to being critical of the Johnson hire.So what is it with UST that you assume attracts all of the intense fans interest?
I graduated from UST and still see no difference in them over Corpus Christi. I go to see the Gophers. Most people have no clue who is playing for UST, so there is very little local interest.
To me, the ones who are advocating so strongly for the Gophers to play UST seem to be the same ones who were so willing to attack the Gophers in the past for things like coaching hires and such. My gut just tells me that they are just secretly hoping that UST can pull off a win just to add some fuel to the fire.
From your perspective is there any long term objective for UST? My sense is that this D1 Summit thing was thrust upon them by the MIAC, this was the best among perhaps unattractive options.I’m connected at UST and I am going to disagree with the premise that their goal is the big east
They want to be a Drake/Creighton/butler type school from a national profile kind of perspectiveFrom your perspective is there any long term objective for UST? My sense is that this D1 Summit thing was thrust upon them by the MIAC, this was the best among perhaps unattractive options.
In today's NCAA landscape with NIL, transfer portals, conference realignments trying to project 20 or even 10 years into the future would appear foolhardy. Have see how this major step goes before reevaluating to another giant leap.
How is that different than playing Missouri Kansas City? Just curiousIF the Gophers played UST now, two possible outcomes:
Gophers win the game. Media and fans say "you're supposed to win that game, and should have won by a bigger margin."
Gophers lose the Game. Media and fans savage the Gophers for losing to a "lesser" opponent. A guy like Barreiro, who almost never mentions Gopher hoops, would do a 20-minute monologue on how embarrassing it is for the Gophers to lose to UST.
Neither outcome is good for the Gopher team - at this time!
Sure, playing UST might bring in a few more fans and some minor extra revenue, but at this point, the downside outweighs the upside.
Eh, bit of a drive for me. I'm more interested in their recruits for next yearIf you want to see them play then go buy a ticket for a UST game. They are cheap and plenty of seats available.