it all comes down to winning. win games, and everyone loves you. If Fleck beats Iowa and Wisconsin, he can stand on his head on the sidelines and people will love it. If he loses to Purdue or Rutgers, all the motivational speeches in the world won't save him.
And as far as fund-raising, the head coach plays at best a secondary role in fund-raising. Maybe if the Gophers won a division title or a B1G title, that might make a significant difference in fund-raising. But short of that, the AD is the lead guy on fund-raising. (and judging from Coyle's stellar communication skills, I would say Lou Nanne had better be leading the charge with the donors.)
+1. It's a two-way street. As soon as players are prohibited from switching schools at the last minute, then we can talk about the "unfairness" of rescinding scholarship offers. Until then, too bad, so sad.
At least our AD can make a decision. He fired Claeys and he's hiring his replacement. Under any previous administration there would have been a committee consisting of at least 70% women wondering if we had interviewed any LBG candidates and a process that would have taken months.
it all comes down to winning. win games, and everyone loves you. If Fleck beats Iowa and Wisconsin, he can stand on his head on the sidelines and people will love it. If he loses to Purdue or Rutgers, all the motivational speeches in the world won't save him.
And as far as fund-raising, the head coach plays at best a secondary role in fund-raising. Maybe if the Gophers won a division title or a B1G title, that might make a significant difference in fund-raising. But short of that, the AD is the lead guy on fund-raising. (and judging from Coyle's stellar communication skills, I would say Lou Nanne had better be leading the charge with the donors.)
Better question is, after talking to his old Coach Kill, does Fleck want us?
There are 3 executive level people in development (an Associate AD and 2 Assistant ADs). There are also a couple of former athletes (Quincy Lewis & Joe Quinn) that deal with Major Gifts. Those are the people that do the heavy fundraising lifting.
He's already oh fer one vs Wisconsin and this with a 13 and 0 team against a Badger team which IMO was offensively limited.
Dropping a kid's scholarship is part of the game, a terrible part of the game, but part of the game.
I am fine with dropping a kids scholarship offer in mid January if it means we can get a better player. If that is what you are afraid of we truly will be average forever.
1,000 times this^^^^
It might be ugly, it might be unfair, but that is how live is. If the head coach doesn't drop a kid to get a better player who is available I don't want that coach running my team.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WEEEEEE don't have a choice. WEEEEE get stuck with Coyle's choice. Against all odds, let's hope it works out.
https://youtu.be/pbVxwHfRk2Q
If giving a walk-on a scholarship that is taped to a football and kicking it to him with an onside, is an "antic". If making a kid feel special, with his "antics". Then by all means I'll take his antics. Most coaches would call the kid in his office and tell him. Instead he shared the moment with his teammates on the field. Instead of bashing him for his "antics", applaud him for creativity and passion for his players.
Personally, I think he would be a very successful hire. At the same time, I do not trust that he would run this program "with class and integrity" because of things like him pulling recruits' scholarships a couple weeks before signing day, then falsely throwing some of the blame on the players:
http://usatodayhss.com/2013/new-coa...ant-you-is-first-thing-indy-area-recruit-told
If we end up hiring him, hopefully he's learned to treat recruits and players with dignity. Having Coyle as boss would certainly not help with that though.
Seems really bizarre that our number one choice would be a guy from the coaching tree of the pissed off ex coach.
The whole thing seems like a complete disaster waiting to happen.
Best case scenario: we overpay for another unproven mid tier guy who we have no idea if he's capable or ready to compete on this level.
Worst case scenario: we lose out on said unproven coach from mid tier.
I was on board with Firing TC as he seemed like he was in over his head and proved as much with his statement on 'CCO. But firing him without any semblance of a plan for his replacement just seems like typical mismanagement of another athletic program at the U.
If Fleck blinks then move on. If they're serious about building the football program they have to be serious in their search and based on everything I'm reading, they're flying by the seat of their pants and that not good enough.
I'm very concerned either way.
Jerry is coming back as the OC at UM.
lol
Seems really bizarre that our number one choice would be a guy from the coaching tree of the pissed off ex coach.
The whole thing seems like a complete disaster waiting to happen.
Best case scenario: we overpay for another unproven mid tier guy who we have no idea if he's capable or ready to compete on this level.
Worst case scenario: we lose out on said unproven coach from mid tier.
I was on board with Firing TC as he seemed like he was in over his head and proved as much with his statement on 'CCO. But firing him without any semblance of a plan for his replacement just seems like typical mismanagement of another athletic program at the U.
If Fleck blinks then move on. If they're serious about building the football program they have to be serious in their search and based on everything I'm reading, they're flying by the seat of their pants and that not good enough.
I'm very concerned either way.
Up to the minute, blow by blow email reports from the Alumni Association on the status of negotiations?.