Livingat45north
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2013
- Messages
- 5,160
- Reaction score
- 1,894
- Points
- 113
Please stop feeding the troll. Ignore GString_4life and he'll go away.
I'm frankly shocked that PJ hasn't had to defend this point, already. How can it be that no one has pressed him on this?
Reporters, if you read this site for ideas .... ask him that! "Coach ... how is it possible that your best QB recruit thus far in your recruiting tenure, came here and you didn't even offer him a scholarship??"
I would like to hear the words out of PJ's mouth on that one. Hopefully wouldn't be gobbledygook, hope he has an honest answer.
For the record, I don't think anything dirty happened. Highly doubt it. I'm just plain ol' curious. Morbidly curious. This type of thing, usually, doesn't happen ... kids, good players, usually just don't throw themselves at you for free ...
"Hey guys! This guy over here is posting too many times and asking hard questions..."
Anyone who wants serious discussion, is free to converse with me.
Anyone who wants to think and say only as the old guys here tell you too, also free to do as you please.
I never said that wasn't the case, and I never said that I think that's wrong to do. I'm also not suggesting PJ should have turned him down or said something like "I appreciate the offer, but I only want you here if I have a scholly to give you". No. None of that.
I'm just CURIOUS about it. I think it's a rare thing. But everyone else here seems to be acting like this: "holy crap! This actually happened! Let's all scurry away as fast as we can, and never talk about it, or else it might un-happen somehow".
Defend what point? He offered him a walk on spot and ZA accepted it.
You act like this is some high crime or something.
And you can say "I dont think anything dirsty happened" but your posts say otherwise.
So which is it, should reporters look for things and go after the coaches for even when there isnt anything to go after or not?
As for you getting all defensive about being called a troll...if it walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck and it swims like a duck it tends to be a duck. You are welcome to your opinions but people arent just going to let it go when you feel the need to stamp out any form of optimism or get all snarky and weird because a player might be better than you think he is. No one is going to make you change your opinion, but they arent just going to let you spout off either and they will call you out when you beat a dead horse like you are seemingly doing here. A player took a walkon spot, that player was good enough to win the starting spot. End of friggin story. I am not sure why you dont like that, or why you feel the need to downplay ZA (or PJ for getting him) but my guess is you are the guy in the stands who assumes any time the Gophers win the opponent stunk.
This has got to be one of the dumbest discussions in GH history and that’s saying something
Good day!
Really really simple. ZA was not heavily recruited prior to his senior year. He really really wanted to play for the gophers, he's a legacy and a fan. He loves Flecks culture, and his brother is on the team. He looks at the depth chart and thinks it's his best shot to actually play for a power 5 team. Gophers offer him a PWO, which is his best offer to date and he accepts.
Then he beats out (yes, beats out) a 4* at IMG and plays the rest of the year. That earns him some scholarship opportunities at Illinois and Pitt among others. Had he told Fleck, I love the gophers, but I can't turn down a scholly, and THEN Fleck said sorry, we don't have one, and he turned into a star player elsewhere, that would be on Fleck. But Fleck sold him that a scholly would come if he came and did well. Sold him on the culture the program and the opportunity. And he decided to still come as a walk on.
It's a great sales job and it worked. That's the story, Fleck has been asked and that's what he said. There's nothing else. His best long term opportunity in his mind was accepting a PWO from his favorite team where his brother plays.
This is a great story, that you've written out of thin air.
Could be exactly correct. But we don't know that. And that's my point .... I just want the official story, straight from PJ and ZA's mouths. Hope they're asked about it.
MN already had a commitment from Brennan Armstrong at the time ZA committed as a walk on. Plan was a HS recruit and a JUCO recruit.
That MN should have offered him a scholly?
Why would they do it if they didn't have to do it?
they should feel bad about it?
Or is your point that ZA shouldn't have accepted the PWO over scholarship offers elsewhere?
It couldn't be working out better for either party, what's the problem?
I know you're going to blow a gasket ... but here goes: so why didn't Fleck offer to give the scholly that was already set aside for BA, to ZA, after BA decommitted? I'm sure you have an answer for that.
Not should. I don't agree should. Fleck can run the program any way he chooses. I'm simply wondering why he didn't.
Sure, if you have a guy that has already committed to walk-on, who is good enough to be a P5 starter, then you've essentially made off with the milk without having to pay for the cow.
No. Again, Fleck can run the program any way he chooses.
That's his personal choice. As you've said, he may well have done it because he though he'd get more playing time at Minnesota, faster/easier than Pitt, Illinois, Cincy, etc. Or could've been other reasons.
I'm just asking, man ...
You don't want to believe me, for some reason .... but I really have no problem with it. I'm just asking a question.
The once 4* recruit that Annexstad beat out at IMG, Arthur Sitkowski, has been named Rutgers starting QB.
Then go ask PJ or ZA yourself.
You're not going to find the answers here so stop ruining threads by posting the same garbage over and over again.
This is a point you have continually come back to, and I admit to being baffled by your persistence.
1. Are you angry that he didn't offer ZA a scholarship? If so, why? Why would that bother you?
2. Do you view it as some kind of evaluative shortcoming? I don't understand that viewpoint either, because Fleck recruited ZA to the U. He wanted him as a player.
3. Do you not see the benefit of convincing a player to walk on and use the extra scholarship on another recruit?
But...there's a dead horse lying there by the side of the road. Pick up your club and keep beating, I guess.
If some 4* kid walked into Fleck's office and said, "Hi, my folks are filthy rich, so I don't need a scholarship, and I want to play for the Gophers" - Fleck would be stupid to say "I'm going to give you a scholarship anyway, because players are supposed to have scholarships."
You tend to get the feeling G4L thinks Morgan should be the starter...
Is this exactly what happened?? If so, fine. I'm satisfied. I'm just asking ...
I know you're going to blow a gasket ... but here goes: so why didn't Fleck offer to give the scholly that was already set aside for BA, to ZA, after BA decommitted? I'm sure you have an answer for that.
Because he already had him committed without giving him a scholarship. We got 25 scholarship players, and we also got two PWOs who were worthy of scholarships. I'll start a Jordan Howden thread so you can spend pages wondering why he didn't get a scholarship when he's good enough to get one.
Added someone to the old ignore list, but I won't say who to spur debate