I don't get why we have fans that think we've been even close to Iowa over the last X number of years. I see tweets (including some from the GopherHole account) from Gopher fans/followers mocking Iowa/their fans for Ferentz's contract as if he hasn't been one of (if not the) most successful coaches in their history and also pretty much dominated Minnesota from a win/loss perspective. I still remember the overreaction to the beat down the Gophers put on Iowa in 2014 and the confidence that we had put them in the rear view mirror. Since that time, the Gophers have lost 3 straight to Iowa (for the record the longest losing streak in the history of the program to Iowa is 4 "accomplished" most recently by Glen Mason to Kirk Ferentz and also done under Jim Wacker/Glen Mason).
I think it's fair to aspire to more than what Ferentz has done at Iowa, but if we are dominating one of the two rivals, playing a competitive series with the other, finishing in the top 10 in the nation occasionally...I don't know how you couldn't call that success. It's fine to have goals/aspirations that exceed that (I do too), but I'd love to get to the point where "we" (as a fanbase) could be disappointed by Kirk Ferentz like results.
I think it's fair to aspire to more than what Ferentz has done at Iowa, but if we are dominating one of the two rivals, playing a competitive series with the other, finishing in the top 10 in the nation occasionally...I don't know how you couldn't call that success. It's fine to have goals/aspirations that exceed that (I do too), but I'd love to get to the point where "we" (as a fanbase) could be disappointed by Kirk Ferentz like results.