Amateur College Football Officially Dead: Judge OK's $2.8B settlement, paving way for colleges to pay athletes





Hopefully the U takes into account that nearly all of it's media revenue is football derived, even if it is derived from the OSUs, PSUs, etc, and pays football players accordingly.

But this is the U so women's crew participants will be getting $500k per year.

We’re gonna have a larger than proportional amount for hockey which will impact football.
 



I'd be very curious to hear a statement from Dinkytown Athletes, as to how they are going to structure their NIL deals to Gopher athletes to ensure they pass muster with the new NIL Go clearinghouse.

hint hint @GopherLady a chance to get the scoop before local/national media figure out how big a deal this aspect of the settlement is
 

The U is paying football, men's and women's basketball, volleyball and men's hockey players.
And I believe the percentages have been known well in advance, something like: football 70%, MBB 10%, WBB 10%, Mens Hockey 5%, Womens Volleyball 5%.

That's of the total allowable $20.5M, which is the starting "cap" for the 2025-26 season. That "cap" will grow each year from there.
 




I'd be very curious to hear a statement from Dinkytown Athletes, as to how they are going to structure their NIL deals to Gopher athletes to ensure they pass muster with the new NIL Go clearinghouse.
I have been wondering the same thing.

A while back I heard a lawyer working with an athletic department say it is expected the clearinghouse will be highly automated, but there was great uncertainty on what parameters would be used.

Also, is the clearinghouse actually expected to validate the deals before they are official or any payments are made?

It seems many are skeptical the clearinghouse will hold up under legal challenges anyway, so it will be interesting to see how/if this works in the next year or two.
 


This is the end of college sports as we know it. I am happy for the kids. That said, as a fan I have now gone from paying for recruiting sites, buying all the extras, watching all the talk shows, etc. to being a fan still but at a much more "I still cheer and care but outside of Saturdays, I just won't give it much more of my time fan."
 

Any attempt to artificially limit how much a player can earn via NIL will be doomed
What do you mean by artificially?

Many very successful sports leagues have a cap on total player salary.


I have read that Congress is considering federal legislation that will limit the NCAA from further antitrust lawsuits.
 



How will presently endowed scholarships in non-football sports like wrestling, track, swimming, etc. be treated?
 


Interesting times. Various players as employees will now make more than university presidents. Can great college teams become a greater source of cash to some universities - yes! The NFL is sure profitable to the owners. Anyone want to buy a university with me that’s financially strapped? We find investors to turn into an elite football program and make millions from tv deals and advertising.
 

Any attempt to artificially limit how much a player can earn via NIL will be doomed

If it's bona fide NIL, that should be true but if it's just disguised pay-for-play, that certainly can be limited. In fact, in reading about the settlement some months ago, there was a planned task force (supposed to be headed by one of the top accounting firms) that would monitor and set standards about what is and what is not legitimate NIL.

Determining what is reasonable compensation for particular services or property is not an impossible task. That is done all the time in the financial sector and by the tax authorities. Caitlin Clark's funds from NIL and endorsements as a professional are easily supported. Large NIL funding to a much more obscure college athlete is more suspect.
 

This is the end of college sports as we know it. I am happy for the kids. That said, as a fan I have now gone from paying for recruiting sites, buying all the extras, watching all the talk shows, etc. to being a fan still but at a much more "I still cheer and care but outside of Saturdays, I just won't give it much more of my time fan."
Sport changed forever as soon as they made it so that teams could openly pay the players and combined that with the foolishness of free transfers and immediate eligibility.

Shame to see them strip away all the things that used to make college athletics special but it is what it is.

In the end the losers in all this are the fans....but the fans haven't really been that important to the powers that be for a long time anyway. I will still follow the Gophers but my interest in the sports of college basketball and football as a whole has been shrinking during all this instability.

Hopefully they find a way to stabilize rosters (especially in basketball) eventually but I'm not holding my breath.
 

When I got tickets to last year's Michigan v Minnesota football game at Ann Arbor, I got on one of their mailing lists. Here's the email I just received from the Michigan AD regarding the effects of the judges decision and how it affects Michigan.

"Dear Michigan Fans, Alumni, and Supporters,

On Friday evening (June 6), Judge Claudia Wilken gave final approval of the House vs. NCAA case, which will drastically change the landscape of college athletics. The settlement results have a significant impact on the finances of our department and the way college athletics are structured. Three key changes are coming to college sports as a result: first, the introduction of a revenue sharing model which allows schools to fund and share up to $20.5 million with student-athletes; second, new roster limits will be phased in over time for all sports; third, unlimited scholarships up to a sport's newly established roster limit.

The prospect of these added costs left U-M Athletics facing a projected deficit of nearly $27 million for the 2025-26 academic year ($20.5 million to fully participate in revenue sharing and $6.2 million in new scholarships). With only six home football games this fall, our projected year-over-year decline in revenue of roughly $19.1 million steepens these costs. The department has implemented several measures to counteract these new expenses. Through adjustments to university financing, budget cuts, travel policies, not filling select positions when vacated and the utilization of new revenue streams, we have reduced our estimated need from $27 million to $15 million for the coming year.

I would like to explain how we improved our financial position and why we still need your continued support.

A fixed factor in this equation is the revenue sharing money as defined by the House settlement. A maximum of roughly $20.5 million per school can be shared with student-athletes for this coming year. Schools can distribute that money any way they see fit. That figure is calculated using a formula that incorporates revenues from media rights, ticket sales, sponsorships, and licensing, calculated at an average across Power 4 institutions. Those inputs are tracked annually, meaning the $20.5 million total will rise in future years. That money, combined with the value of tuition, room and board, and the many other benefits already provided, leaves NCAA student-athletes in a position to receive a similar percentage of revenue shared with professional sports athletes. We will support our student-athletes with the full amount allowed each year to remain competitive for Big Ten Conference and National championships.

Another fixed factor to consider is scholarship costs, which are rising. The results of the House settlement will allow departments to offer full scholarships for every roster spot on every team, directly connecting a team’s ability to compete to its level of scholarship support. With 82.1 new scholarships added across 19 sports for fall 2025, at a cost of an additional $6.2 million, Michigan Athletics will be supporting athletic scholarships at an annual total cost of nearly $40 million.

To combat the added cost, the department staff will gradually decline in number through two methods: attrition, with a long-term goal of a 10 percent reduction in total staff, and through a stricter approval process for new hires. The department has committed to more than $10 million in budget cuts for the coming fiscal year, and has worked with the main campus to reduce its allocation from TV revenue to the university from $8 million to $2 million. We also revamped our travel policy, which resulted in over $900,000 in savings during 2024-25.

Our athletic department is also producing more revenue from events in our facilities, such as our partnerships with Upper Deck Golf and AEG/Zach Bryan. Events such as international soccer matches and the 2014 NHL Winter Classic generated between $750,000 and $3 million each for the department in the past. The 2024 calendar year saw the implementation of alcohol sales at Crisler Center, Yost Ice Arena, and Michigan Stadium, which generated over $2.25 million for the department. We will continue to evaluate other opportunities to generate additional revenue throughout the department.

These changes have been a tremendous undertaking for our department, but we know they are just the beginning. We ask for your continued support and understanding, and welcome your questions, comments, and concerns.

Go Blue!
Warde Manuel
Warde Manuel
Donald R. Shepherd Director of Athletics"
 




Top Bottom