Alvarez did not say UM and UW were in the ame division. The author said it "seems certain," which is still pure speculation.
Why is Alvarez giving this info away anyway? Something seems weird about that.
Speculation is making me care less and less. Until I see it finalized, I could care less. Minnesota has no say in the matter cause we have no pull in the Big 10. I just roll with the punches that TOSU and Michigan errrr...the Big 10 throw at us.
The North/South division makes more sense than some of the splits I have seen.
I agree with a previous poster who said the names should; Michigan division and Ohio State division. I would prefer the NAGURSKI division and the GRANGE division, but it would probably end up being the BO division and the WOODY division.
I just don't see the rest of the conference agreeing to names that solidify the Big 2/Little 10 stereotype. Also, I don't see the conference branding themselves that way. It'd be stupid. The only thing you'd know about each division is whether OSU or Michigan are in it.
Sigh...its early, I have meetings to go to that I don't like, and you were being tongue in cheek weren't you?
Why does Maturi still seem to know nothing? You got me...
Rittenberg says:
http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/14936/division-dominoes-wisconsin-iowa-to-split
He predicts divisions will be...
Division 1
Michigan Michigan State Iowa Nebraska Illinois Northwestern
Division 2
Ohio State Penn State Wisconsin Minnesota Purdue Indiana
Oh hell no!! That is nearly the worst of all possible alignments for the Gophers!
Rittenberg says:
http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/14936/division-dominoes-wisconsin-iowa-to-split
He predicts divisions will be...
Division 1
Michigan Michigan State Iowa Nebraska Illinois Northwestern
Division 2
Ohio State Penn State Wisconsin Minnesota Purdue Indiana
Oh hell no!! That is nearly the worst of all possible alignments for the Gophers!
Rittenberg says:
http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/14936/division-dominoes-wisconsin-iowa-to-split
He predicts divisions will be...
Division 1
Michigan Michigan State Iowa Nebraska Illinois Northwestern
Division 2
Ohio State Penn State Wisconsin Minnesota Purdue Indiana
Oh hell no!! That is nearly the worst of all possible alignments for the Gophers!
Per Rittenberg's scenario, he thinks the cross-over to be preserved is WI and IA. This means IA would not preserve the rivalry with MN. And, IA fans for the last 10 years have wanted to play PSU every year. They would rather have PSU-IA as their protected cross-over. If this played out, IA-WI protected, who would MN have a protected rivalry with? Michigan, or no one?
Per Rittenberg's scenario, he thinks the cross-over to be preserved is WI and IA. This means IA would not preserve the rivalry with MN. And, IA fans for the last 10 years have wanted to play PSU every year. They would rather have PSU-IA as their protected cross-over. If this played out, IA-WI protected, who would MN have a protected rivalry with? Michigan, or no one?
Under Rittenberg's scenario, assuming Iowa-Wisconsin protected along with Michigan-Ohio State, wouldn't the other ones be:
Michigan State-Penn State (Land Grant Trophy sort of a rivalry)
Minnesota-Nebraska (they've played a lot in the past)
Illinois-Purdue (not really a rivalry)
Indiana-Northwestern (ditto)
However they do this, it's going to difficult (if not impossible) to have the protected cross-overs all be true or even partial rivalries.