You don't get to count Big Ten Tournament games in his record. His Big Ten record is 14-22 (.388). The Big Ten winning percentages of his predecessors are .426, .188 (interim), .393, .381, .182 (interim), and .444 going back the last 40 years. Meanwhile, the Big Ten winning percentages of Kill's predecessors are .400 (interim), .222, .400, .200, .396, .412, .278, and .482 over the last 40 years. In other words, Pitino has the worst Big Ten winning percentage of the last 40 years among non-interim coaches and Haskins - and Haskins had several of his best years wiped away by cheating. His record is also worse than his predecessor's, who was vilified by the fan base for achieving superior results. Meanwhile, Kill's conference record is demonstrably better than his predecessor's, and bettered in the last 40 years only by Holtz (a HOFer) and Stoll. When you look at things in a vacuum, they look pretty similar. When you take context and trajectory into account, they are very different.