TRF Guy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
- Messages
- 16,372
- Reaction score
- 8,576
- Points
- 113
61’Wow.
Were you born in the 50s?
61’Wow.
Were you born in the 50s?
Maybe on Clevinger or Lorenzen. Don't know enough about their current situation to really advocate for either one.I agree with Festa.
What about Dallas Hill?
If, they can get Clevinger or Lorenzen for a good deal and can’t see why they wouldn’t, they should sign them today.
They came out in 68’ so yeah I was gobbling them upYou were gobbling up cards that young?
I’m 66.
I have the ‘69 Twins set. I’m finishing up some of my 87-92 overall sets and working on my Kirby Puckett collection (over 300 unique cards now). After that I’m gonna try to get as many Twins Topps sets as possible.Anyone else have any of these cards? I have a set of them but need to find them
1968 Topps Game
This insert set from the 1960s is unique. It’s a very limited set and like the 1964 Topps Giants seems to contain only the best of the best. The cards measure 2.25” x 3.25” so slightly smaller than today’s standard sized card. The cards resemble a deck of playing cards. The complete set has 33 cards, three of which are Twins players. Each card has a color image of the player, facsimile autograph, and a game outcome. This set contains a second year Rod Carew (#29) after his rookie card in 1967 was a dual card with the Senators’ Hank Allen.
1968 Topps and the Minnesota Twins
Hey Twins fans! This is the fourth post in my series about Minnesota Twins baseball cards. Please read my first post here for deeper detail on my series. 1968 Topps Game This insert set from the 1960s is unique. It’s a very limited set and like the 1964 Topps Giants seems to contain only the best...twinsdaily.com
They came out in 68’ so yeah I was gobbling them up
I was born inThey came out in 68’ so yeah I was gobbling them up
They came out in 68’ so yeah I was gobbling themYou were gobbling up cards that young?
I’m 66.
just a number my friendI was born in96,86,76, 66, so man are you ancient
No one on here was seriously advocating to sign Snell or Montgomery.It's easy for us to say "The Twins should sign X player."
Just like it's easy for Jim Souhan to write a column saying the Twins should have signed Blake Snell for $30-million a year.
there's just one problem. the owners of the team don't want to spend that kind of money.
The Twins came out last year and told everyone they would be cutting the payroll. They didn't try to hide it or lie about it. They said what they were planning to do, and then they did it.
So why does anyone think the Pohlads are suddenly going to change their minds and say "what the hell, we don't care if we lose money. let's jack up the payroll!"
I read the same article and posted part of it previously. Gleeman talked specifically about Clevinger and/or Lorenzen as realistic targets that wouldn’t break the bank or retreads like Hill or Kueckel.It ain't going to happen.
Aaron Gleeman in The Athletic had an article on Duran's injury -and of course, he made sure to mention that the Twins' options were limited because the owners were cutting payroll.
if Pablo Lopez hangs a sweeper on Opening Day and gives up a home run, I fully expect Gleeman, Twins Daily, and all the rest to find some way to blame that on a reduced payroll.
If spending an extra $6-8 million on Lorenzen or Clevinger to avoid letting a bad rotation train-wreck an otherwise good team is too much to ask of the Pohlads, they should sell the team.It's easy for us to say "The Twins should sign X player."
Just like it's easy for Jim Souhan to write a column saying the Twins should have signed Blake Snell for $30-million a year.
there's just one problem. the owners of the team don't want to spend that kind of money.
The Twins came out last year and told everyone they would be cutting the payroll. They didn't try to hide it or lie about it. They said what they were planning to do, and then they did it.
So why does anyone think the Pohlads are suddenly going to change their minds and say "what the hell, we don't care if we lose money. let's jack up the payroll!"
It ain't going to happen.
Aaron Gleeman in The Athletic had an article on Duran's injury -and of course, he made sure to mention that the Twins' options were limited because the owners were cutting payroll.
if Pablo Lopez hangs a sweeper on Opening Day and gives up a home run, I fully expect Gleeman, Twins Daily, and all the rest to find some way to blame that on a reduced payroll.
Maybe. More than likely the front office was given very stick parameters for payroll and this is what it looks like. Would it be nice if the twins would spend an additional $20 million this year, yes, but that is not what they do.But apparently he was an excuse to do nothing.
I don't think most expected them to go spend $20-30 million on a pitcher. They'd have kept Gray then. But refusing to spend $6-8 on a decent 4th starter like Lorenzen/Clevinger is just pathetic.Maybe. More than likely the front office was given very stick parameters for payroll and this is what it looks like. Would it be nice if the twins would spend an additional $20 million this year, yes, but that is not what they do.
Amazing alliterative name, to boot.Happy 76th birthday to 1969 first-round draft pick Paul Powell.
He hit an eighth-inning homer for his first MLB hit on April 10, 1971. (Unfortunately, it would be his only home run.)
In 1984, Twins right fielder Andre David homered on his first MLB swing off Jack Morris for his only career home run.View attachment 30643
I don't follow MLB as closely as most on here. Why haven't other teams signed Lorenzen or Clevinger?I don't think most expected them to go spend $20-30 million on a pitcher. They'd have kept Gray then. But refusing to spend $6-8 on a decent 4th starter like Lorenzen/Clevinger is just pathetic.
Clevinger has some personal baggage. Not sure on Lorenzen.I don't follow MLB as closely as most on here. Why haven't other teams signed Lorenzen or Clevinger?
Lorenzen was pretty bad down the stretch last year and was pushed to the bullpen in Philly.Clevinger has some personal baggage. Not sure on Lorenzen.
I'm less worried about Varland than I am about Paddock. Either way, they will almost certainly need another starter soon enough.Lorenzen was pretty bad down the stretch last year and was pushed to the bullpen in Philly.
I'd rather Varland get the chance over those two guys but it leaves them in a tough situation if Varland isn't very good or someone gets hurt. Woods Richardson looked pretty good in the spring and there's Festa.
Varland getting his piss worked today vs. theLorenzen was pretty bad down the stretch last year and was pushed to the bullpen in Philly.
I'd rather Varland get the chance over those two guys but it leaves them in a tough situation if Varland isn't very good or someone gets hurt. Woods Richardson looked pretty good in the spring and there's Festa.
I'm less worried about Varland than I am about Paddock. Either way, they will almost certainly need another starter soon enough.
I don't think there's anything there and he will still get a chance if he's #7.Maybe time to find out on Woods Richardson, one way or another.
I don't think there's anything there and he will still get a chance if he's #7.
I know it’s not my money, but the twins should have definitely sign him for this.