Yeah, someday down the road, we might see a bunch of former Bama players on TV, telling some Nightline guy all about all of the money they got from boosters, but just like UCLA and Wooden, nothing will come of it. Instead they will continue to go after programs like the Gopher's. What was it that they banned the Basketball Gophers from the 1977 NCAA tournament for, one single player selling a couple of his game tickets? If it was more than that, fine, count me as uninformed or misinformed, but that is what I heard it was for.
The thing is, in reality, a good majority of employers out there, and I'm not talking about mom and pop shops located somewhere in SEC territory, but businesses that are going to care about being successful and/or making a profit, will take a Minnesota graduate over an Alabama graduate any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
Go look up the two schools on Wikipedia and you will see in the Bama article, how they brag about their 22nd ranked Law school, and their 58th ranked Business school and their 61st ranked Nursing program and their 104th ranked Engineering program???
That is the best they got.
Now go look up what the UMn site brags about, and see if you can find them even mentioning any program outside of the Top 25, or even outside of the Top 10 for the most part, much less 58th or 61st or 104th??
Overall rankings say a lot, too.
Bama people like to mention the one US News and World Report ranking that has them at #103, the same lame ass source has UMn at #71.
Looking only at that ranking, you'd think that there might not be much of a difference between the two schools, cept that Bama has a legit fb program and Minnesota doesn't.
But that is the National Ranking. The same source's Global ranking has UMn at #38 and Bama at #431.
Then the Forbes Ranking has UMn at #119 to Bama's #252.
Then the Washington Monthly Ranking has UMn at #53 and Bama at #260.
Then the ARWU national ranking has UMn at #24 and well, for some reason there is no natl ARWU ranking for Bama? Wonder why? If it was any good, they would have listed it.
Then looking at the Global Rankings,
The QS Global rankings has UMn ranked #137 and Bama ranked #601-650.
And the Washington Times ranking has Minnesota ranked #53 and Bama is apparently not ranked.
And the Global ARWU rankings has Minnesota ranked #33 and again, Bama is no where listed among their Top 500.
So outside of producing better football players, which they may need to buy? What in the world does Bama produce that Minnesota doesn't do better at producing???