Bayfieldgopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 9,143
- Reaction score
- 1,655
- Points
- 113
I'm worried about adjusting to defending the gimmick offense they run.
and seeing the run discipline issues we had versus Michigan and Northwestern especially I could see us having fits against the option ground mix that Air Force still rolls out.
We have downgraded in the "D" coordinator position significantly in particular.
This, plus a lack of discipline on the Gophers part under Brewster makes this game scary.
I'd be interested in how Cosgrove's D's have faired against the triple option in the past. Certain D coordinators have track records against certain offenses, I was under the impression that Cosgrove's main achilles heel was the defending the spread, and that he had actually faired well at times against pro style offenses. Anyone know if he has a record against the triple option? Either at Nebraska or Wisky?
I do think we have the personnel to defend it though, fast linebackers, veteran safeties and a solid DT/MLB trio. Stuff the FB, string out the QB/RB, and be ready to react to any wrinkles(counters, passes, reverses).
I'd be interested in how Cosgrove's D's have faired against the triple option in the past. Certain D coordinators have track records against certain offenses, I was under the impression that Cosgrove's main achilles heel was the defending the spread, and that he had actually faired well at times against pro style offenses. Anyone know if he has a record against the triple option? Either at Nebraska or Wisky?
I do think we have the personnel to defend it though, fast linebackers, veteran safeties and a solid DT/MLB trio. Stuff the FB, string out the QB/RB, and be ready to react to any wrinkles(counters, passes, reverses).
I think it would make sense for there to be some different personel packages for air force, maybe play the safeties wide and the corners deep, or mix in theret/royston at corner. Rallis/Cooper/Lawrence might also be keys with their speed/tackling skills
What leads you to that conclusion?
????
The Gopher defense improved greatly under Ted Roof. He is a highly respected and touted DC (not so much head coach). He has produced strong defenses everywhere he has been. His players improve and develop.
Cosgrove had a nice run a while back, but his last job ended poorly. His defenses got worse as his recruits got better. He was not a desired replacement, he was available. He's no Everett Withers, for sure, but it is a downgrade to go to the current co/co relationship from Ted Roof.
As has already been addressed, the lack of discipline under Brewster has been evident to anyone watching. Nearly cost us games last year (Purdue in particular). Cost us games in 2007 (too many to mention).
The Gopher defense improved greatly under Ted Roof.
Cost us games in 2007 (too many to mention).
It will be interesting to see but to defend the option it is crucial that you have corners that can step up and defend against a larger RB and can maintain discipline and not go after the QB who has the ball on the outside runs.
The departure of Ted Roof is perhaps the biggest stumbling block the Gophers face going into next year. I was never sold on our spread coast purism and was okay with shaking up the OC position, but to lose perhaps the best DC I've ever seen at this school was a major blow.
Compared to Roof or Withers, Cosgrove gives me major concerns. His stint at Nebraska was a disaster, and I seriously question his ability to recruit going forward.