Dano564
Fleck Superfan
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Messages
- 10,213
- Reaction score
- 3,016
- Points
- 113
You were right on the first 10, too bad you’re wrong on the last 2...
Wow.
Thanks for the bump.
Hopefully I am wrong on the last two.
You were right on the first 10, too bad you’re wrong on the last 2...
Waiting for g4l response...
Nebraska - Nebraska has a really good offense. People look at the score last year and see blowout but forget that Minnesota had a touchdown called back early and also cut it to one score late first half. This could be a loss but I’m saying Win by 1-7 points.
Why are people posting about 2019 in a pre-season 2018 thread? What is happening?
Carry on
Watch, we’ll beat SDSU 21-14 with them having the ball, driving for the game tying TD and our defense holds.
You watch then, people will be breaking down the doors here to say how we’re only going to win three games this year. That’s how it goes on the ‘Hole. Lot of loud-mouths, who probably never played a down of football in their lives.
Meanwhile SDSU swill go on to another top 4 finish in FCS, not that anyone here will give a crap or have the slightest clue what that means.
9-3 is my guess as well. I understand that media and others are not confident because Fleck does not have an established, dominant QB or even a starter named yet. I think whoever is named the starter will do just fine this year with the weapons on offense spreading the field.9-3 brotha.
NMSU - big W
Fresno - small W
Ohio - medium W
@ Maryland - small W
Iowa - small W
@ Ohio State - big L
@ Nebraska - small L
Indiana - small W
@ Illinois - medium W
Purdue - small W
Northwestern - small W
@ Wisconsin - medium L
Honestly I think we lose @ Wisconsin while playing for a share of the Big Ten West
Why are people posting about 2019 in a pre-season 2018 thread? What is happening?
Carry on
If only there was a way to start a new thread for 2019 predictions?
Maybe we can just change the title? I've heard you can do that.
When you break it down, I see the season in four sections:
1) Non-conf -- I am cautiously predicting 3-0.
2) @Purdue/Ill/Neb -- very doubtful we'll go 3-0 here. Not sure if 2-1 or 1-2. Purdue will be out for blood. Don't know how good Ill or Neb will be this year yet. Both smoked us last year, but folks here will tell you those don't count because now we're Rossi-fied. We'll see
3) @Rutgers/Maryland -- on the road is always tough, but you'd like to hope we can find a way to win, and we owe Maryland a loss. Cautiously predicting 2-0.
4) Penn St/@Iowa/@NW/Wisc -- brutal stretch. My big thing here, and for the season too ... don't get embarrassed in any of these games. No games like NW 2017. Keep them close. Keep them winnable. Could see anything from 0-4 to 2-2.
And of course all of these are on paper, with no injuries or anything really out of the ordinary that changes the teams drastically.
So if you say, 3-0, 1-2, 2-0, 1-3 .... that's 7-5.
When you break it down, I see the season in four sections:
1) Non-conf -- I am cautiously predicting 3-0.
2) @Purdue/Ill/Neb -- very doubtful we'll go 3-0 here. Not sure if 2-1 or 1-2. Purdue will be out for blood. Don't know how good Ill or Neb will be this year yet. Both smoked us last year, but folks here will tell you those don't count because now we're Rossi-fied. We'll see
3) @Rutgers/Maryland -- on the road is always tough, but you'd like to hope we can find a way to win, and we owe Maryland a loss. Cautiously predicting 2-0.
4) Penn St/@Iowa/@NW/Wisc -- brutal stretch. My big thing here, and for the season too ... don't get embarrassed in any of these games. No games like NW 2017. Keep them close. Keep them winnable. Could see anything from 0-4 to 2-2.
And of course all of these are on paper, with no injuries or anything really out of the ordinary that changes the teams drastically.
So if you say, 3-0, 1-2, 2-0, 1-3 .... that's 7-5.
When you break it down, I see the season in four sections:
1) Non-conf -- I am cautiously predicting 3-0.
2) @Purdue/Ill/Neb -- very doubtful we'll go 3-0 here. Not sure if 2-1 or 1-2. Purdue will be out for blood. Don't know how good Ill or Neb will be this year yet. Both smoked us last year, but folks here will tell you those don't count because now we're Rossi-fied. We'll see
3) @Rutgers/Maryland -- on the road is always tough, but you'd like to hope we can find a way to win, and we owe Maryland a loss. Cautiously predicting 2-0.
4) Penn St/@Iowa/@NW/Wisc -- brutal stretch. My big thing here, and for the season too ... don't get embarrassed in any of these games. No games like NW 2017. Keep them close. Keep them winnable. Could see anything from 0-4 to 2-2.
And of course all of these are on paper, with no injuries or anything really out of the ordinary that changes the teams drastically.
So if you say, 3-0, 1-2, 2-0, 1-3 .... that's 7-5.
It could happen that way. If you're right, the stadium will be half-empty and recruiting will suffer.
Interesting. Gophs led inside 2 minutes to go @ Purdue in 2017. That was absolutely a winnable game.
You must have much more faith in Brohm and staff than Fleck and staff. You must think Purdue's win over OSU as less of a surprise than Goph's over Purdue. You must rate Purdue's loss @ home to Wisconsin higher than Gophs win @ Wisconsin. Purdue got completely dominated in its bowl game; Gophs dominated in its bowl game. Purdue went 1-3 in its last four games in 2018; Gophs went 3-1.
Attendance and recruiting will both improve over this past year.
That makes logical sense, as factually a 7-5 record is an improvement over 6-6.
If there are fans too thick skulled to accept that, then good riddance!
Pretty broad statement. Care to be more specific?