49-19, still 7 minutes to go.Now South is ahead 42-19 under 10 minutes to go. Haven't punted yet.
Having one of the best players (west) helpsEdina over EP.
South, Shakopee, Rosemount, Eagan anyone else run similar offense in that district?Having one of the best players (west) helps
Now that maple grove it’s wide open
I may pick Moorhead
Eagan, shakopee, Rosemount run midline triple or a variationSouth, Shakopee, Rosemount, Eagan anyone else run similar offense in that district?
if either can play defense Moorhead won’t win against South or Minnetonka.
Did Maple Grove turn the ball over a bunch? South was good but never in a million years would have thought they would be able to put up 49 on Maple Grove.
Makes the egg Rosemount laid last week against STMA even more frustrating. Not sure I can bring myself to pull for South but I guess they are the only non West division team left in the final 4.
The TDs alone by South accounted for more than 240 yds of rushing.I am pretty shocked by South. Didn’t score more than 35 all year on any South metro team.
They game they had 35 they had 3 special teams plays that put them inside the 20 or better
They only have one guy who can punish you (#12)
#12 has 6 touchdowns tonight
Against that T one wrong step by 2 guys and it’s out the gateThe TDs alone by South accounted for more than 240 yds of rushing.
Lakeville South vs Maple Grove Eastview High School Football | November 7, 2025 | StribVarsity
Check the pregame, live and post-game details from the Lakeville South vs Maple Grove Football game on November 7, 2025.varsity.startribune.com
Great story
Against that T one wrong step by 2 guys and it’s out the gate
S and backside inside backer looking at back action instead of line action and they simply go the wrong way on this play
OL really good.Attending in-person watching from the stands, the mis-directions a couple of times faked me out as much as the Maple Grove defense.
Even without the trickery, South's O-Line was just blowing the opposition several yards into the backfield, pretty much every play.
Just goes to show again the poll voters don't know squat...Just goes to show that the poll voters only pay attention to upper 2 classes... Filmore Central above Breckenridge is laughable when you compare schedules and QRF#s
The member schools would disagree on the regional representation. Those parts of the state want what they have. You’re going to hear and see a proposal again to go back to section football in 6A again. Last time the vote was 18-14 changing it.Just goes to show again the poll voters don't know squat...
Also shows how the format should be redone and that every region from MN doesn't need a repetitive at the quarter final level.
In class A probably 2 or maybe even up to 4 the top 10 teams are not in the state tournament when you start looking at things closely... Barnum and Lester Prairie had no business in the State tournament. Lester had 1 win over a team with a winning record and that didn't come till the section championship game. Barnum gave up 300 yards rushing in the first 20 minuets last night and If Breckenridge wanted to they could have scored 100. Upsala Swanville Area played 2 good teams and lost both games this year.
If there was a seeding at the section championship level I think last nights games are all much closer. I assume #1 V #16 and #2 v #14 would still result in blowouts but that is a little bit to be excepted with teams that are favorites to get the the championship game. But a look to Class 6A and there are no extreme blowouts at the quarterfinals
Make it make sense though...The member schools would disagree on the regional representation. Those parts of the state want what they have. You’re going to hear and see a proposal again to go back to section football in 6A again. Last time the vote was 18-14 changing it.
Of course you are going to have at least 2 of the Top 10 teams miss the State Tournament. That's how math works in an 8 Team field.Just goes to show again the poll voters don't know squat...
Also shows how the format should be redone and that every region from MN doesn't need a repetitive at the quarter final level.
In class A probably 2 or maybe even up to 4 the top 10 teams are not in the state tournament when you start looking at things closely...
Because they weren't good enough to Win the Tournament. Proven on the field.Why would anyone want the 2nd best team in a class to not make the state tournament, BOLD last 2 years, probably more schools in that same time frame and again this year
I probably chose my words wrong. Class a almost always has a top 4 teamn left out.Of course you are going to have at least 2 of the Top 10 teams miss the State Tournament. That's how math works in an 8 Team field.
Additionally, I prefer regional representation, immensely.
If a team didn't win their Section, at minimum that means they were not good enough to be State Champion. I don't care if we're still good enough to be one of the other rated 2-8.
you are arguing to keep weak teams in a tournament to crown the best team, that's a loser mentality... let's not have the 2nd best team in the state at the state tournament but let's replace them with the 17th best just becasue they fall geographicly where id like to see a team come from.Because they weren't good enough to Win the Tournament. Proven on the field.
2nd Place = 1st Loser.
NO, it is not insane. I view the State Tournament as a way to identify the Best Team. Not teams 2-8. Lose your Section, get out of the way and let someone else have a crack at it.Your not winning section championship means you didn't deserve a chance to be in the top 8 is absolutely insane.
Look at BOLD the last few seasons. Easily a top 2 team. And I bet if you were on the team who was 2nd best in the state and had a runner up section championship trophy vs a runner up state champion trophy youd sing a different tune.
They remaining teams aren't weak. They are Section CHAMPIONS and thus earned a bid to the State Tournament.you are arguing to keep weak teams in a tournament to crown the best team, that's a looser mentality... let's not have the 2nd best team in the state at the state tournament but let's replace them with the 17th best just becasue they fall geographicly where id like to see a team come from.
When there is a vote, people in weak sections prefer section playMake it make sense though...
Was there a vote in class 5A-9P to move to the same format as 6A? Was there a vote in 5A-9P to seed 1-16? Why does 6A get to vote on things while the majority of the state gets bent over the barrel by the MSHSL?
Why would anyone want the 2nd best team in a class to not make the state tournament, BOLD last 2 years, probably more schools in that same time frame and again this year